Skip to Main Content
Random forests for classification in ecologyAuthor(s): D. Richard Cutler; Thomas C. Edwards; Karin H. Beard; Adele Cutler; Kyle T. Hess; Jacob Gibson; Joshua J. Lawler
Source: Ecology. 88(11): 2783-2792.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
Download Publication (189.0 KB)
Related Research Highlights
Using FIA Data to Predict Forest Understory Vegetation Structure
DescriptionClassification procedures are some of the most widely used statistical methods in ecology. Random forests (RF) is a new and powerful statistical classifier that is well established in other disciplines but is relatively unknown in ecology. Advantages of RF compared to other statistical classifiers include (1) very high classification accuracy; (2) a novel method of determining variable importance; (3) ability to model complex interactions among predictor variables; (4) flexibility to perform several types of statistical data analysis, including regression, classification, survival analysis, and unsupervised learning; and (5) an algorithm for imputing missing values. We compared the accuracies of RF and four other commonly used statistical classifiers using data on invasive plant species presence in Lava Beds National Monument, California, USA, rare lichen species presence in the Pacific Northwest, USA, and nest sites for cavity nesting birds in the Uinta Mountains, Utah, USA. We observed high classification accuracy in all applications as measured by cross-validation and, in the case of the lichen data, by independent test data, when comparing RF to other common classification methods. We also observed that the variables that RF identified as most important for classifying invasive plant species coincided with expectations based on the literature.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCutler, D. Richard; Edwards, Thomas C.; Beard, Karin H.; Cutler, Adele; Hess, Kyle T.; Gibson, Jacob; Lawler, Joshua J. 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology. 88(11): 2783-2792.
Keywordsadditive logistic regression, classification trees, LDA, logistic regression, machine learning, partial dependence plots, random forests, species distribution models
- Effects of sample survey design on the accuracy of classification tree models in species distribution models
- Invasive Species Distribution Modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?
- Logistic regression accuracy across different spatial and temporal scales for a wide-ranging species, the marbled murrelet
XML: View XML