Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Charles B. Yackulic; Larissa L. Bailey; Katie M. Dugger; Raymond J. Davis; Alan B. Franklin; Eric D. Forsman; Steven H. Ackers; Lawrence S. Andrews; Lowell V Diller; Scott A. Gremel; Keith A. Hamm; Dale R. Herter; J. Mark Higley; Rob B. Horn; Christopher McCafferty; Janice A. Reid; Jeremy T. Rockweit; Stan G. Sovern
    Date: 2019
    Source: Ecological Applications. 29(3): e01861-.
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (969.0 KB)

    Description

    Slow ecological processes challenge conservation. Short-term variability can obscure the importance of slower processes that may ultimately determine the state of a system. Furthermore, management actions with slow responses can be hard to justify. One response to slow processes is to explicitly concentrate analysis on state dynamics. Here, we focus on identifying drivers of Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) territorial occupancy dynamics across 11 study areas spanning their geographic range and forecasting response to potential management actions. Competition with Barred Owls (Strix varia) has increased Spotted Owl territory extinction probabilities across all study areas and driven recent declines in Spotted Owl populations. Without management intervention, the Northern Spotted Owl subspecies will be extirpated from parts of its current range within decades. In the short term, Barred Owl removal can be effective. Over longer time spans, however, maintaining or improving habitat conditions can help promote the persistence of northern spotted owl populations. In most study areas, habitat effects on expected Northern Spotted Owl territorial occupancy are actually greater than the effects of competition from Barred Owls. This study suggests how intensive management actions (removal of a competitor) with rapid results can complement a slower management action (i.e., promoting forest succession).

    Publication Notes

    • Visit PNW's Publication Request Page to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Yackulic, Charles B.; Bailey, Larissa L.; Dugger, Katie M.; Davis, Raymond J.; Franklin, Alan B.; Forsman, Eric D.; Ackers, Steven H.; Andrews, Lawrence S.; Diller, Lowell V.; Gremel, Scott A.; Hamm, Keith A.; Herter, Dale R.; Higley, J. Mark; Horn, Rob B.; McCafferty, Christopher; Reid, Janice A.; Rockweit, Jeremy T.; Sovern, Stan G. 2019. The past and future roles of competition and habitat in the range‐wide occupancy dynamics of Northern Spotted Owls. Ecological Applications. 29(3): e01861-. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1861.

    Cited

    Google Scholar

    Keywords

    Competitive exclusion, ecological forecasting, geographic range dynamics, late-successional habitat, old growth forest, temporal scaling.

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/58852