Vegetation mapping to support greater sage‐grouse habitat monitoring and management: multi‐ or univariate approach?Author(s): Emilie B. Henderson; David M. Bell; Matthew J. Gregory
Source: Ecosphere. 10(8): 967-.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
View PDF (4.0 MB)
Conservation planning for wildlife species requires mapping and assessment of habitat suitability across broad areas, often relying on a diverse suite, or stack, of geospatial data presenting multidimensional controls on a species. Stacks of univariate, independently developed vegetation layers may not represent relationships between each variable that can be characterized by multivariate modeling techniques, leading to inaccurate inferences on the distribution of suitable habitat. In this paper, we examine the role of variable combining in mapping multiple dimensions of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus, GRSG) habitat as a basis for GRSG conservation in the great basin ecoregion within southeastern Oregon. We compare two modeling approaches: a univariate random forest regression model (RF regression) and a multivariate random forest nearest neighbor (RFNN) imputation model , across an array of variables. These include five GRSG habitat descriptor variables: percent cover of trees, juniper, sagebrush, and GRSG food forbs, and the proportion of grasses that are exotic annuals. We also model species distributions of 51 common species in the sage steppe and combine these predictions to estimate alpha diversity. Our results show that RF regression and RFNN can yield univariate predictions with similar performance, but RF regression predictions tend to contain slightly more bias at broader spatial scales. Stacking univariate predictions from RF regression yields covariance errors that manifest as logical errors (juniper cover > tree cover), biases in estimates of GRSG habitat area, and biases in estimates of alpha diversity. Combining variables from the RFNN model does not introduce covariance errors. We conclude that multivariate modeling approaches are better suited to map multidimensional habitat niches at broader spatial scales, and also better suited to provide information for defining multivariable adaptive management triggers at the population level or above.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHenderson, Emilie B.; Bell, David M.; Gregory, Matthew J. 2019. Vegetation mapping to support greater sage‐grouse habitat monitoring and management: multi‐ or univariate approach?. Ecosphere. 10(8): 967-. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2838.
KeywordsGreater sage-grouse, habitat mapping, nearest neighbor imputation, random forest, sage steppe, southeast Oregon.
- Landscape restoration for greater sage-grouse: implications for multiscale planning and monitoring
- Lek ecology of male greater sage-grouse in Carbon County, Wyoming
- Ecology of greater sage-grouse in the Dakotas
XML: View XML