Skip to Main Content
A comparison of level set and marker methods for the simulation of wildland fire front propagationAuthor(s): Anthony S. Bova; William E. Mell; Chad M. Hoffman
Source: International Journal of Wildland Fire. 25(2): 229-241.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
Download Publication (975.0 KB)
DescriptionSimulating an advancing fire front may be achieved within a Lagrangian or Eulerian framework. In the former, independently moving markers are connected to form a fire front, whereas in the latter, values representing the moving front are calculated at points within a fixed grid. Despite a mathematical equivalence between the two methods, it is not clear that both will produce the same results when implemented numerically. Here, we describe simulations of fire spread created using a level set Eulerian approach (as implemented in the wildland-urban interface fire dynamics simulator, WFDS) and a marker method (as implemented in FARSITE). Simulations of surface fire spread, in two different fuels and over domains of increasing topographical complexity, are compared to evaluate the difference in outcomes between the two models. The differences between the results of the two models are minor, especially compared with the uncertainties inherent in the modelling of fire spread
- Visit PNW's Publication Request Page to request a hard copy of this publication.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBova, Anthony S.; Mell, William E.; Hoffman, Chad M. 2016. A comparison of level set and marker methods for the simulation of wildland fire front propagation. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 25(2): 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13178.
- Modeling wildland fire propagation with level set methods
- A landscape-scale wildland fire study using coupled weather-wildland fire model and airborne remote sensing
- Comparing effects of fire modeling methods on simulated fire patterns and succession: a case study in the Missouri Ozarks
XML: View XML