How sensitive are spatial estimates of wilderness recreation values to information about hiking destinations?Author(s): José J. Sánchez; Kenneth Baerenklau; Armando Gonzalez-Caban
Source: Journal of Forest Economics
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Pacific Southwest Research Station
Download Publication (3.0 MB)
This study uses individual survey data to investigate the impact of information about hiking destinations on estimated wilderness values in a spatial context. The data is derived from a revealed preference survey of backcountry visitors who responded to questions about their recreation behavior in the San Jacinto Wilderness of southern California. Two GIS data layers are developed showing spatial representations of non-market values derived from a Kuhn- Tucker demand model, with and without destination information. Each pixel in each data layer contains an estimate of the recreation value at that location. The destination data provides more detailed information on recreation behavior that can be used to more accurately allocate the landscape values. Results show that including destination information produces significantly greater heterogeneity in parcel value estimates for large areas of the wilderness.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationSánchez, José J.; Baerenklau, Kenneth; Gonzalez-Caban, Armando. 2020. How sensitive are spatial estimates of wilderness recreation values to information about hiking destinations? Journal of Forest Economics. 35(1): 19-41. https://doi.org/10.1561/112.00000447.
KeywordsGIS, Kuhn-Tucker demand system model, Nonmarket valuation, Web-based survey, Viewshed analysis
- Great gulf wilderness use estimation: comparisons from 1976, 1989, and 1999
- Economics of forest fire management: Spatial accounting of costs and benefits
- Deliberating the experiential qualities of wilderness: Similar meanings, but divergent standards
XML: View XML