Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Minghui Diao; Tracey Holloway; Seohyun Choi; Susan M. O’Neill; Mohammad Z. Al-Hamdan; Aaron Van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Xiaomeng Jin; Arlene M. Fiore; Daven K. Henze; Forrest Lacey; Patrick L. Kinney; Frank Freedman; Narasimhan K. Larkin; Yufei Zou; James T. Kelly; Ambarish Vaidyanathan
    Date: 2019
    Source: Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 69(12): 1391-1414.
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (2.0 MB)


    Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a well-established risk factor for public health. To support both health risk assessment and epidemiological studies, data are needed on spatial and temporal patterns of PM2.5 exposures. This review article surveys publicly available exposure datasets for surface PM2.5 mass concentrations over the contiguous U.S., summarizes their applications and limitations, and provides suggestions on future research needs. The complex landscape of satellite instruments, model capabilities, monitor networks, and data synthesis methods offers opportunities for research development, but would benefit from guidance for new users. Guidance is provided to access publicly available PM2.5 datasets, to explain and compare different approaches for dataset generation, and to identify sources of uncertainties associated with various types of datasets. Three main sources used to create PM2.5 exposure data are: ground-based measurements (especially regulatory monitoring), satellite retrievals (especially aerosol optical depth, AOD), and atmospheric chemistry models. We find inconsistencies among several publicly available PM2.5 estimates, highlighting uncertainties in the exposure datasets that are often overlooked in health effects analyses. Major differences among PM2.5 estimates emerge from the choice of data (ground-based, satellite, and/or model), the spatiotemporal resolutions, and the algorithms used to fuse data sources.

    Implications: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has large impacts on human morbidity and mortality. Even though the methods for generating the PM2.5 exposure estimates have been significantly improved in recent years, there is a lack of review articles that document PM2.5 exposure datasets that are publicly available and easily accessible by the health and air quality communities. In this article, we discuss the main methods that generate PM2.5 data, compare several publicly available datasets, and show the applications of various data fusion approaches. Guidance to access and critique these datasets are provided for stakeholders in public health sectors.

    Publication Notes

    • Visit PNW's Publication Request Page to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Diao, Minghui; Holloway, Tracey; Choi, Seohyun; O’Neill, Susan M.; Al-Hamdan, Mohammad Z.; Van Donkelaar, Aaron; Martin, Randall V.; Jin, Xiaomeng; Fiore, Arlene M.; Henze, Daven K.; Lacey, Forrest; Kinney, Patrick L.; Freedman, Frank; Larkin, Narasimhan K.; Zou, Yufei; Kelly, James T.; Vaidyanathan, Ambarish. 2019. Methods, availability, and applications of PM2.5 exposure estimates derived from ground measurements, satellite, and atmospheric models. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 69(12): 1391-1414.


    Google Scholar


    PM2.5, exposure estimate, satellite AOD, ground monitors, model simulations, wildfire, air quality, public health.

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page