Skip to Main Content
Exploring wildfire-prone community trust in wildfire management agenciesAuthor(s): Rebecca Rasch; Sarah McCaffrey
Source: Forest Science. 65(5): 652-663.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
Download Publication (156.0 KB)
Related Research Highlights
Understanding Community Trust in Wildfire Management Agencies
DescriptionThis research examines how trustworthy wildfire management agencies are perceived to be in five wildfire-prone communities. Trust was most often expressed in the context of agency abilities or competence (calculative trust), whereas distrust was framed in the context of intentions or the belief that the agency is not acting in the best interest of the community (relational trust). Five factors identified as closely tied to an individual’s trust in wildfire agencies are: communication from the agency; perceived relations among different management agencies, as well as between agencies and the public; experiences with wildfire agencies, particularly during wildfire events; experience with prescribed burns; and values or preferences for management actions. Managers hoping to build, maintain, or restore trust with communities may need to work on building a reputation of both competence and intention to act in the best interest of the community. Results indicate that level of trust in agencies varies considerably, both across and within communities, but that applied at the right scale, the wildfire community archetype framework, a method for rapidly identifying the level of adaptive capacity in wildfire-prone communities appears to be a relatively good indicator of the level of trust community members have in an agency’s abilities.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationRasch, Rebecca; McCaffrey, Sarah. 2019 Exploring wildfire-prone community trust in wildfire management agencies. Forest Science. 65(5): 652-663.
Keywordswildland fire management, calculative trust, relational trust, wildland-urban interface, social diversity, hazards human dimensions of wildfire
- The role of trust in residents’ fire wise actions
- Homebuyers and wildfire risk: a Colorado Springs case study
- Homebuyers and wildfire risk: A Colorado Springs case study
XML: View XML