Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Christopher J. Dunn; Christopher D. O’Connor; Jesse Abrams; Matthew P. ThompsonDave E. Calkin; James D. Johnston; Rick Stratton; Julie Gilbertson-Day
    Date: 2020
    Source: Environmental Research Letters. 15: 025001.
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (2.0 MB)


    Large and severe wildfires are an observable consequence of an increasingly arid American West. There is increasing consensus that human communities, land managers, and fire managers need to adapt and learn to live with wildfires. However, a myriad of human and ecological factors constrain adaptation, and existing science-based management strategies are not sufficient to address fire as both a problem and solution. To that end, we present a novel risk-science approach that aligns wildfire response decisions, mitigation opportunities, and land management objectives by consciously integrating social, ecological and fire management system needs.Weuse fire-prone landscapes of the US Pacific Northwest as our study area, and report on and describe how three complementary riskbased analytic tools - quantitative wildfire risk assessment, mapping of suppression difficulty, and atlases of potential control locations - can form the foundation for adaptive governance in fire management. Together, these tools integrate wildfire risk with fire management difficulties and opportunities, providing a more complete picture of the wildfire risk management challenge. Leveraging recent and ongoing experience integrating local experiential knowledge with these tools, we provide examples and discuss how these geospatial datasets create a risk-based planning structure that spans multiple spatial scales and uses. These uses include pre-planning strategic wildfire response, implementing safe wildfire response balancing risk with likelihood of success, and alignment of nonwildfire mitigation opportunities to support wildfire risk management more directly.Weexplicitly focus on multi-jurisdictional landscapes to demonstrate how these tools highlight the shared responsibility of wildfire risk mitigation. By integrating quantitative risk science, expert judgement and adaptive co-management, this process provides a much-needed pathway to transform fire-prone social ecological systems to be more responsive and adaptable to change and live with fire in an increasingly arid American West.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Dunn, Christopher J.; O’Connor, Christopher D.; Abrams, Jesse; Thompson, Matthew P.; Calkin, Dave E.; Johnston, James D.; Stratton, Rick; Gilbertson-Day, Julie. 2020. Wildfire risk science facilitates adaptation of fire-prone social-ecological systems to the new fire reality. Environmental Research Letters. 15: 025001.


    Google Scholar


    wildfire management, adaptive co-management, shared stewardship, social-ecological systems, risk management, decision support, analytics

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page