Skip to Main Content
Building consensus: Legitimate hope or seductive paradox?Author(s): Stephen F. McCool; Kathleen Guthrie; Jane Kapler Smith
Source: Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-25. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 14 p.
Publication Series: Research Paper (RP)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
View PDF (177.0 KB)
DescriptionTo understand how participants in a natural resource planning situation described the nature of consensus, we interviewed scientists, agency planners and managers, and public representatives in two planning processes on the Bitterroot National Forest in west-central Montana. While most interviewees felt the agency had included affected interests and felt that the problem could be resolved through public participation, disagreements about the problem definition occurred. Most could "live with" the decision of the agency, but some could not. People varied in their capacity to assimilate the information presented at public meetings. Interviewees varied in their interpretation of whether a consensus was arrived at in the two public involvement processes investigated, but most agreed that it was an essential step in planning.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMcCool, Stephen F.; Guthrie, Kathleen; Smith, Jane Kapler. 2000. Building consensus: Legitimate hope or seductive paradox? Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-25. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 14 p.
KeywordsEcosystem management, human dimension, consensus, public involvement, public participation
- Making "stuff" happen through public participation and consensus building
- ECO-Report - Research-management-public partnership continues
- Limits of acceptable change planning in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness: 1985 to 1997 (FIDL)
XML: View XML