Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Trainee’s reactions to logger training course characteristics: data from 300 courses held in Italy


Natascia Magagnotti
Raffaele Spinelli



Publication type:

Scientific Journal (JRNL)

Primary Station(s):

Southern Research Station


International Journal of Forest Engineering


Reaction surveys were collected during over 300 logger training courses issued between 2007 and 2015 in Piemonte (north western Italy). In the reaction surveys, trainees were asked to rate several course attributes, which were grouped under the following items: utility, outcome, teaching, content, and amenities. Reaction scores were intersected with participant demographics and course type, and the relationships were tested through a general model and path analysis. Results indicated a general level of satisfaction, as well as stratification of results for different participant groups. In particular, employees seemed more interested in course outcome (qualification), while logging managers placed a stronger emphasis on utility (acquiring new skills). Managers and consultants were more critical about course content, compared with employees. Consultants – generally holding a university education – were especially appreciative of teaching quality. These findings pointed to opportunities for improving course design, which may be specifically adapted to participant group. Reaction surveys can offer a good proxy for training transfer, in the absence of dedicated pre- and post-training field evaluations. Future surveys should also include a clear description of participant expectations, for a more accurate interpretation of the reaction survey.


Magagnotti, Natascia; Smidt, Mathew; Spinelli, Raffaele. 2021. Trainee’s reactions to logger training course characteristics: data from 300 courses held in Italy. International Journal of Forest Engineering. 32(1): 67-76.


Publication Notes

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.