Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): M.S. Riedel; J.M. Vose; D.S. Leigh
    Date: 2003
    Source: Second Conference on Watershed Management to Meet Emerging TMDL Environmental Regulations. November 8-12, 2003. Marriott Hotel, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
    Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
    PDF: View PDF  (562 KB)

    Description

    We monitored water quality in the Chattooga River Watershed (NE Georgia, NW South Carolina, and SW North Carolina) to compare sediment TMDLs with observed water quality. A judicial consent decree required the EPA to establish TMDLs in one year. The EPA was unable to fully characterize the sediment budgets of these streams and consequently issued phased sediment TMDLs which can be revised "...because information on the actual contributions of sediment to the Chattooga River Watershed from both point and nonpoint sources will be much better characterized in the future." The EPA listed streams as sediment impaired based upon aquatic indicator species data and relied upon total suspended solids (TSS) data and modeling to establish the sediment TMDLs. We found that TSS concentrations do not reflect mineral sediment concentrations because the organic and mineral components of TSS were highly variable between streams. TSS in forested streams could get quite high and were largely organic whereas TSS in streams more heavily impacted by land use change and roads were mostly mineral sediment. TSS and mineral sediment in a stream listed as being sediment impaired were significantly lower than streams listed as being only threatened. We also monitored bed material transport and sampled sediment mineralogy on one of our study streams. The sand and fine gravel in this stream were very dynamic. In-stream scour and deposition occurred frequently. No in-stream deposition occurred during small events; when road runoff was negligible. During larger events, road runoff and in-stream sediment deposition occurred. This suggests that the existing sediment TMDLs may not address the causes of sediment impairment of the aquatic ecosystems. The EPA's issuance of phased sediment TMDLs was insightful because it acknowledged our lack of understanding of the impacts of land usage and sediment dynamics on streams in the Chattooga River watershed.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Riedel, M.S.; Vose, J.M.; Leigh, D.S. 2003. The Road to TMDL is Paved with Good Intentions--Total Maximum Daily Loads for a Wild and Scenic River in the Southern Appalachians. Second Conference on Watershed Management to Meet Emerging TMDL Environmental Regulations. November 8-12, 2003. Marriott Hotel, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

    Keywords

    TMDL, TSS, water quality, sedimentation, organic matter, forest roads

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page