Skip to Main Content
Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.
Testing common stream sampling methods for broad-scale, long-term monitoringAuthor(s): Eric K. Archer; Brett B. Roper; Richard C. Henderson; Nick Bouwes; S. Chad Mellison; Jeffrey L. Kershner
Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-122. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain research Station. 15 p.
Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
View PDF (285 B)
DescriptionWe evaluated sampling variability of stream habitat sampling methods used by the USDA Forest Service and the USDI Bureau of Land Management monitoring program for the upper Columbia River Basin. Three separate studies were conducted to describe the variability of individual measurement techniques, variability between crews, and temporal variation throughout the summer sampling season. We quantified the variability between crews and through time, and described the percent of the total variability attributed between crew and seasonal variability. We then estimated the number of samples needed to detect change between managed and reference sites.
Differences among streams accounted for a larger share of the total variability than did differences among observers. Stream variability was greater than 80 percent of the total variability for 12 of the 16 variables measured. This is somewhat surprising given the similarities between the study streams. Observer variability was minimal for stream habitat methods describing reach, streambank, and cross-section variables. Conversely, variability was higher for pool, large woody debris, and substrate variables. Seasonal variation was minimal for stream channel variables with the exception of substrate particle sizes. Sample sizes derived from both observer and stream variability (type I error 0.1, type II error 0.9, minimum detectable change 10 percent) ranged from 10 to 3,502 sites to detect changes between two populations. We believe that these estimates represent an unambiguous and powerful way to display the consequences of variability to scientists and managers.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationArcher, Eric K.; Roper, Brett B.; Henderson, Richard C.; Bouwes, Nick; Mellison, S. Chad; Kershner, Jeffrey L. 2004. Testing common stream sampling methods for broad-scale, long-term monitoring. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-122. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain research Station. 15 p.
Keywordshabitat, measurement, seasonal variability, Columbia River Basin
- Repeatability of riparian vegetation sampling methods: how useful are these techniques for broad-scale, long-term monitoring?
- Sample Size and Allocation of Effort in Point Count Sampling of Birds in Bottomland Hardwood Forests
- Sampling methods for amphibians in streams in the Pacific Northwest.
XML: View XML