Skip to Main Content
Guide to effective monitoring of aquatic and riparian resourcesAuthor(s): Jeffrey L. Kershner; Eric K. Archer; Marc Coles-Ritchie; Ervin R. Cowley; Richard C. Henderson; Kim Kratz; Charles M. Quimby; David L. Turner; Linda C. Ulmer; Mark R. Vinson
Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-121. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 57 p.
Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
View PDF (3.7 MB)
DescriptionThis monitoring plan for aquatic and riparian resources was developed in response to monitoring needs addressed in the Biological Opinions for bull trout (U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service 1998) and steelhead (U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service). It provides a consistent framework for implementing the effectiveness monitoring of aquatic and riparian resources within the range of the Pacific Anadromous Fish Strategy (PACFISH) and the Inland Fish Strategy (INFISH). The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of land management activities on aquatic and riparian communities at multiple scales and to determine whether PACFISH/INFISH management practices are effective in maintaining or improving the structure and function of riparian and aquatic conditions at both the landscape and watershed scales on Federal lands throughout the upper Columbia River Basin.
A list of attributes thought to be important in defining aquatic and riparian habitat conditions and their relationship with listed species were identified. The list of attributes was then translated into measurable criteria and compiled to form sampling protocols for both stream channel parameters (Part II) and vegetation parameters (Part III). These sampling methods were tested for variability, and the results are documented in two other publications "Testing Common Stream Sampling Methods for Broad-Scale, Long-Term Monitoring." (Archer and others 2004) and "The Repeatability of Riparian Vegetation Sampling Methods: How Useful Are These Techniques for Broad-Scale Monitoring?" (Coles-Ritchie and others, in preparation).
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationKershner, Jeffrey L.; Archer, Eric K.; Coles-Ritchie, Marc; Cowley, Ervin R.; Henderson, Richard C.; Kratz, Kim; Quimby, Charles M.; Turner, David L.; Ulmer, Linda C.; Vinson, Mark R. 2004. Guide to effective monitoring of aquatic and riparian resources. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-121. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 57 p.
Keywordseffectiveness monitoring, stream habitat, riparian habitat, monitoring strategy, aquatic sampling, vegetation sampling, watershed conditions, critical riparian area
- Modeling the dynamic responses of riparian vegetation and salmon habitat in the Oregon Coast Range with state-and-transition models
- Effects of riparian canopy opening and salmon carcass addition on the abundance and growth of resident salmonids
- Linking habitat quality with trophic performance of steelhead along forest gradients in the South Fork Trinity River watershed, California
XML: View XML