Skip to Main Content
Reproducibility and Reliability: How To Define the Population of Trees That Represent Site Quality For Longleaf Pine PlantationsAuthor(s): J.C.G. Goelz; Daniel J. Leduc
Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–71. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 189-195
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (174 KB)
DescriptionWe compared 13 definitions for the subpopulation of “site trees.” Each subpopulation was defined (1) once at base age or at each measurement; (2) by crown class, diameter, or height; and (3) by the number of trees per acre. These subpopulations were applied to base ages of 25 and 50. For base age 25, the subpopulations defined at base age were superior to those defined at each measurement. The subpopulations defined by dominant and codominant trees were slightly superior to the subpopulations defined by the 40 tallest or thickest trees per acre. Generally, subpopulations defined by diameter were superior to subpopulations defined by height, and the subpopulations that included more trees were superior to those that included fewer. For base age 50, there was very little or no benefit from defining the subpopulations at base age. Among the subpopulations defined at each measurement, the one defined as dominant and codominant trees was superior. We selected this subpopulation for our site index modeling work. The results are largely explained by the stability of tree rankings within a plot over time. Ranking with respect to height is much less stable than ranking by diameter. Crown class was unexpectedly stable from measurement to measurement.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGoelz, J.C.G.; Leduc, Daniel J. 2004. Reproducibility and Reliability: How To Define the Population of Trees That Represent Site Quality For Longleaf Pine Plantations. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–71. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 189-195
- Value of Tree Measurements Made at Age 5 Years for Predicting the Height and Diameter Growth at Age 25 Years in Loblolly Pine Plantations
- Influence of crown class, diameter, and sprout rank on red maple (Acer rubrum L.) development during forest succession in Connecticut
- Improving Estimates of Acceptable Growiing Stock in Young Upland Oak Forests in the Missouri Ozarks
XML: View XML