Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

 Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.


  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Chad Bolding; Bobby Lanford; Loren Kellogg
    Date: 2003
    Source: In: Proceedings of the 2003 COFE. 7-10 September 2003. Bar Harbor, ME: 5 p.
    Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
    PDF: View PDF  (96 KB)

    Description

    Due to recent catastrophic wildfires, forest fuel reduction has become one of the most discussed topics in forest engineering research. Considerable money and resources are being spent in an attempt to seek answers for tough questions. Lack of information, especially concerning mechanical fuel reduction methods, has stemmed several studies. This paper compiles the available methods - mechanical and non-mechanical approachesto reduce forest fuel levels. One major area lacking information concerned with mechanical fuel reduction is the few available cost and productivity estimates associated with harvesting small stems. Small stems, the target of fuel harvesting, prove economically difficult to extract from the forest due to their low value and high cost associated with their removal. Results from a recent study in Alabama examining a cut-to-length (CTL) operation combined with a small in-woods chipper showed that the low impact system can effectively reduce fuel loads and keep operations small and efficient. Also, the small in-woods chipper was able to process resultant biomass from the operation into a merchantable product (energy chips). In areas where markets are available, the energywood can be used as an alternative energy source. These results are not only applicable in Alabama, but also have implications in the Pacific Northwest (PNW), where forest fire hazards are greater. Through a review and compilation of recent studies on CTL and cable yarding alternatives in the PNW, these implications are explored for a range of factors.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Bolding, Chad; Lanford, Bobby; Kellogg, Loren. 2003. Forest fuel reduction: Current methods and future possibilities. In: Proceedings of the 2003 COFE. 7-10 September 2003. Bar Harbor, ME: 5 p.

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/7286