Skip to Main Content
Productivity and cost of conventional understory biomass harvesting systemsAuthor(s): Douglas E. Miller; Thomas J. Straka; Bryce J. Stokes; William Watson
Source: For. Prod. J. 37(5): 39-43.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (240 KB)
DescriptionConventional harvesting equipment was tested for removing forest understory biomass (energywood) for use as fuel. Two types of systems were tested--a one-pass system and a two-pass system. In the one-pass system, the energywood and pulpwood were harvested simultaneously. In the two-pass system, the energywood was harvested in a first pass through the stand, and the pulpwood was harvested iris second pass. These systems were tested over a range of understory biomass amounts. Equations were developed to estimate the cost per green ton of energywood. The two-pass system exhibited high harvesting costs when biomass amounts were low, but costs moderated as biomass amounts increased. The one-pass system harvesting costs were not sensitive to the amount of energywood present.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMiller, Douglas E.; Straka, Thomas J.; Stokes, Bryce J.; Watson, William. 1987. Productivity and cost of conventional understory biomass harvesting systems. For. Prod. J. 37(5): 39-43.
- Alternate biomass harvesting systems using conventional equipment
- Comparisons of two methods of harvesting biomass for energy
- Integration of Biomass Harvesting and Site Preparation
XML: View XML