Skip to Main Content
Ensuring Environmentally Sustainable Production of Dedicated Biomass FeedstocksAuthor(s): V.R. Tolbert; D.A. Mays; A. Houston; D.D. Tyler; C.H. Perry; K.E. Brooks; F.C. Thornton; B.R. Bock; J.D. Joslin; Carl C. Trettin; J. Isebrands
Source: Biocentropy 2000, Moving Technology into the Marketplace, The Ninth Biennial Bioenergy Conference Proceedings, Buffalo, NY, October 15-19, 2000
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: Download Publication (180 KB)
DescriptionEnsuring acceptance of dedicated biomass feedstocks by landowners, agricultural communities, environmental and public interest groups, requires that the environmental benefits, concerns, and risks associated with their production be quantified. Establishment and management measures to benefit soil and water quality are being identified by ongoing research. Field studies are showing that nutrients are retained within the rooting zone of dedicated feedstocks, subsurface herbicide transport does not occur, and off-site chemical transport is minimal compared with traditional agricultural crops. The amounts and timing of fertilizer application were critical to minimizing off-site transport of nutrients. Maintaining soil cover decreased runoff, sediment losses, and nutrient transport compared with traditional agricultural crops. Conversion of traditional croplands to biomass and no-till crop production improved soil quality and soil carbon storage. Subsurface nutrient losses were less from biomass crops than adjacent natural forests or agricultural crops in Minnesota. Data across the spectrum of climates and soils from North to South show initial gains in soil carbon are greater at shallow depths (0- 10 cm) and in lower organic soils. Addressing environmental questions across planting scales and documenting changes in soil and water quality with biomass crop production on former agricultural lands is critical to identifying production options to (1) maximize environmental quality, (2) minimize environmental risks, and (3) ensure economic benefits for growers.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationTolbert, V.R.; Mays, D.A.; Houston, A.; Tyler, D.D.; Perry, C.H.; Brooks, K.E.; Thornton, F.C.; Bock, B.R.; Joslin, J.D.; Trettin, Carl C.; Isebrands, J. 2000. Ensuring Environmentally Sustainable Production of Dedicated Biomass Feedstocks. Biocentropy 2000, Moving Technology into the Marketplace, The Ninth Biennial Bioenergy Conference Proceedings, Buffalo, NY, October 15-19, 2000
- Sustainability of High Intensity Forest Management with Respect to Water QuaIity and Site Nutrient Reserves
- Sustainability of corn stover harvest strategies in Pennsylvania
- Linking resilience theory and diffusion of innovations theory to understand the potential for perennials in the U.S. Corn Belt
XML: View XML