Influence of forest and rangeland management on anadromous fish habitat in Western North America: forest chemicals.Author(s): L.A. Norris; H.W. Lorz; S.V. Gregory
Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-149. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 95 p
Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
View PDF (2.13 MB)
DescriptionHerbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, and fire retardants are chemicals used to protect or enhance certain forest resources. Their use may directly affect anadromous fish by exposing them to toxic amounts of the chemical. Indirect effects are also possible through chemically induced alteration of habitat, including direct effects on fish-food organisms.
Data on the movement, persistence, and toxicity of chemicals provide a basis for evaluating potential direct effects of chemical use on fish and fish-food organisms. Data are included for seven herbicides (2,4-D, picloram, atrazine, MSMA, fosamine ammonium, glyphosate, and dinoseb), urea fertilizer, and the ammonium-based fire retardants. Comparison of exposures and toxicities of these materials shows their current uses provide a reasonable margin of safety to anadromous fish if direct application to surface waters is avoided.
Much less information is available on indirect effects of chemical use on anadromous fish habitat. The potential effects are known, but few quantitative data exist to evaluate their importance. Apparently, the best way to minimize indirect effects is to minimize the effects of chemicals on all biota in the riparian zone.
Research is needed on the role of buffer strips in reducing entry and impact of forest chemicals in streams, patterns of entry of selected chemicals into streams, instream fate of most forest chemicals, toxicity characteristics of combinations of forest chemicals, the interaction between amount and duration of organism exposure to toxicants, potential latent effects from short-term exposure, effects of forest chemicals on aquatic species under field conditions, and the indirect effects of using forest chemicals on anadromous fish habitat.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationNorris, L.A.; Lorz, H.W.; Gregory, S.V. 1983. Influence of forest and rangeland management on anadromous fish habitat in Western North America: forest chemicals. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-149. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 95 p
KeywordsAnadromous fish, fish habitat, herbicide, insecticide, urea fertilizer, fire retardants, 2, 4-D, picloram, atrazine, MSMA, fosamine ammonium, glyphosate, dinoseb, carbaryl, acephate, malathion, azinphos-methyl, carbofuran, ammonia
- Effects of fire retardant on water quality
- Influence of forest and rangeland management on anadromous fish habitat in Western North America: silvicultural treatments.
- Influence of forest and rangeland management on anadromous fish habitat in Western North America: economic considerations.
XML: View XML