Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Ronald E. Thill; Alton Martin; Hershel F. Morris; Austin T. Harrel
    Date: 1995
    Source: Res. Pap. SO-289. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 20 p.
    Publication Series: Research Paper (RP)
    Station: Southern Forest Experiment Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (625.0 KB)


    A study was conducted on the dietary and nutritional effects of cattle grazing and rotational prescribed burning on the diets of three to five captive white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) bluestem (Andropogon spp. and Schizachyriumspp.) sites in central Louisiana from October 1980 through February 1987. Deer diets were evaluated under ungrazed, moderate year-long, heavy seasonal, and heavy year-long cattle grazing treatments. Deer diets were composed mostly of browse and forbs under all grazing treatments, but were less diverse under heavy grazing when compared with moderate and no grazing treatments. Foraging efficiency (computed as the ratio of forage intake per 30-minute trial to the distance traveled) was comparable among treatments during spring and fall but was lower under the heavy grazing treatment during summer and winter. Diets selected under ungrazed conditions contained the highest percentage of uncommon and ephemeral plant taxa during all seasons except fall. Dietary crude protein (CP), phosphorus (P), and calcium-to-phosphorus ratios varied significantly under various grazing treatments for certain seasons. Prescribed burning did not significantly affect diet diversity; however, diets from areas of first-year burns were higher in CP and P than from areas of older burns during spring and summer, but these differences disappeared by the first fall after burning. From a nutritional standpoint, burning and seasonal influences generally had more impact than grazing treatments on deer diets. No evidence was found that seasonal or yearlongcattle grazing at moderate levels (40-to 50-percent herbage removal) adversely affected deer nutrition.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Thill, Ronald E.; Martin, Alton, Jr.; Morris, Hershel F., Jr.; Harrel, Austin T. 1995. Effects of Prescribed Burning and Cattle Grazing on Deer Diets in Louisiana. Res. Pap. SO-289. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 20 p.


    Google Scholar


    Diet diversity, intake, nutrition, Odocoileus virginianus

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page