Skip to Main Content
A comparison of two rough mill cutting modelsAuthor(s): Steven Ruddell; Henry Huber; Powsiri Klinkhachorn
Source: Forest Products Journal 40(5):27-30
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: Download Publication (1.0 MB)
DescriptionA comparison of lumber yield using the Automated Lumber Processing System (ALPS) Cutting Program and the Optimal Furniture Cutting Program (OFCP) was conducted on eight cutting bills. No.1 Common grade hard maple data files were compiled using a board database collected and used by the USDA Forest Service's Forest Products Laboratory to develop standard hardwood lwnber yield tables. The ALPS Cutting Program processed three furniture cutting bills, three kitchen cabinet cutting bills, and two "other" cutting bills with a board database of 343 boards containing 2,180 board feet. The ALPS Cutting Program was used to determine the maximum yield by selecting the number of parts cut for each cutting bill. The OFCP was used on the same cutting bills to generate the optimal yield of lumber that can be obtained by applying conventional roughmill technology. The results showed that by using ALPS and the ALPS Cutting Program, yield increases of 12.6t o 22.9p en:ent can be realized.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationRuddell, Steven; Huber, Henry; Klinkhachorn, Powsiri. 1990. A comparison of two rough mill cutting models. Forest Products Journal 40(5):27-30
- Development of a computer method for predicting lumber cutting yields.
- Low-Cost Opportunity for Small-Scale Manufacture of Hardwood Blanks
- Defects and Grading after Kiln Drying Hardwood Lumber Sawn from Small-diameter Logs
XML: View XML