Skip to Main Content
Performance of container and bareroot loblolly pine seedlings on bottomlands in South CarolinaAuthor(s): James P. Barnett; John M. McGilvray
Source: Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 17, No. 2
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (284 KB)
DescriptionThe performance of container and bareroot loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings from the same improved seedlot was compared on highly productive bottomland sites in South Carolina. At the time of planting, size and quality of the open-grown container stock were equal to or better than bareroot material. When outplanting conditions were ideal, field plantings in March, April, and May of 2 successive years indicated equal performance of the 2 stock types. When conditions were more stressfu1, container stock survived and grew better than bareroot seedlings. Needle-tip burn caused by postplanting app1ication.s of herbicides had no long-term effects on seedling growth.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBarnett, James P.; McGilvray, John M. 1993. Performance of container and bareroot loblolly pine seedlings on bottomlands in South Carolina. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 17, No. 2
- Survival and Growth of Container and Bareroot Shortleaf Pine Seedlings in Missouri
- Comparing methods of artificially regenerating loblolly and slash pines: container planting, bareroot planting, and spot seeding
- Assessing potential genetic gains from varietal planting stock in loblolly pine plantations
XML: View XML