Skip to Main Content
Comparing methods of artificially regenerating loblolly and slash pines: container planting, bareroot planting, and spot seedingAuthor(s): James D. Haywood; James P Barnett
Source: Tree Planters' Notes. 45(2):63-67.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (395 KB)
DescriptionIn central Louisiana, loblolly (Pinus taeda L.) and slash (P. elliottii Engelm. var. elliottii,) pines were artificially regenerated by three methods: (1)planting 14-week-old container stock, (2)planting 1+0 bareroot stock, and (3)spot seeding. A common seed source was use for each species for all regeneration methods. Spot seeding was done by sowing 10 repellent-treated seeds per spot on the same 2.44- by 2.44-m (8- by 8-ft) spacing used for planting. Each seeded spot was thinned to one seedling after establishment was certain. After 15 growing seasons, loblolly and slash pines in the container and bareroot plantings had outproduced the spot-seeded trees. Loblolly pines on the container, bareroot, and seeded plots yielded 146.2, 163.9, and 96.7 m3/ha, respectively. Slash pines on the container, bareroot, and seeded plots yielded 190.1, 178.8, and 149.4 m
/ha respectively. The seeded trees were younger from seed than the bareroot stock, and this reflected in stand volume. Although container was only 14 weeks old at planting, growth was comparable to that of the bareroot seedlings. Results show that seeding can be a low-cost regeneration alternative if some reduction in volume is acceptable.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHaywood, James D.; Barnett, James P. 1994. Comparing methods of artificially regenerating loblolly and slash pines: container planting, bareroot planting, and spot seeding. Tree Planters'' Notes. 45(2):63-67.
- Overstory and understory relationships in longleaf pine plantations 14 years after thinning and woody control
- Small topographic differences affect slash pine response to site preparation and fertilization
- Participatory genetic improvement: longleaf pine
XML: View XML