Skip to Main Content
Estimating the board foot to cubic foot ratioAuthor(s): Steve P. Verrill; Victoria L. Herian; Henry N. Spelter
Source: Res. Pap. FPL-RP-616. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: 18 pages
Publication Series: Research Paper (RP)
Station: Forest Products Laboratory
View PDF (801 KB)
DescriptionCertain issues in recent softwood lumber trade negotiations have centered on the method for converting estimates of timber volumes reported in cubic meters to board feet. Such conversions depend on many factors; three of the most important of these are log length, diameter, and taper. Average log diameters vary by region and have declined in the western United States due to the growing scarcity of large diameter, old-growth trees. Such a systematic reduction in size in the log population affects volume conversions from cubic units to board feet, which makes traditional rule of thumb conversion factors antiquated. In this paper we present an improved empirical method for performing cubic volume to board foot conversions.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationVerrill, Steve P.; Herian, Victoria L.; Spelter, Henry N. 2004. Estimating the board foot to cubic foot ratio. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-616. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: 18 pages
KeywordsScribner scaling, diameter, length, taper, truncated cone, smoothing, calibration
- Conversion of board foot scaled logs to cubic meters in Washington State, 1970–1998
- Trends in lumber processing in the western United States. Part I: board foot Scribner volume per cubic foot of timber
- Board-Foot and cubic-foot volume tables for Alaska-cedar in southeast Alaska.
XML: View XML