Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Joseph L. GaneyWilliam M. Block; Jeffrey S. Jenness; Randolph A. Wilson
    Date: 1997
    Source: Journal of Wildlife Research. 2(2): 115-123.
    Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
    PDF: Download Publication  (760 KB)


    To provide information on comparative habitat use, we studied radiotagged Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida: n = 13) and great horned owls (Bubo virginianus: n = 4) in northern Arizona. Home-range size (95% adaptive kernel estimate) did not differ significantly between species during either the breeding or nonbreeding season. Home ranges overlapped considerably between species, but overlap in use of individual stands was limited. Relative area of 4 canopy-cover classes (<20, 20-39, 40-59, and [greater than/equal to] 60% canopy cover) and 3 cover types (ponderosa pine forest, pine-oak forest. and meadow) did not differ between ranges of spotted and great horned owls in either season. Use of canopy-cover classes differed between species in both seasons, however, and use of cover types differed during the breeding season. In general, great horned owls used meadows and open stands (canopy cover <40%) more than spotted owls, who roosted and foraged primarily in forests with [greater than/equal to] 40% canopy cover. Structural characteristics of forest stands within the home range also differed between species, as did characteristics of stands used for foraging and roosting. Differences in structural characteristics were consistent with observed differences in use of canopy-cover classes and cover types: stands used by great horned owls had lower log volume, less shrub and canopy cover, and greater herbaceous cover than stands used by spotted owls. The observed patterns of habitat use are consistent with morphological features suggesting that great horned owls are adapted to hunt in more open habitats than spotted owls. Our results suggest that silvicultural treatments that reduce canopy cover below 40% or create large openings within the forest will likely favor great horned owls, whereas maintenance of closed-canopy stands (canopy cover [greater than/equal to] 60%) should favor spotted owls. Such stands were rare in our study area, arguing for their conservation where they occur.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Ganey, Joseph L.; Block, William M.; Jenness, Jeffrey S.; Wilson, Randolph A. 1997. Comparative habitat use of sympatric Mexican spotted and great horned owls. Journal of Wildlife Research. 2(2): 115-123.


    Arizona, Bubo virginianus, great horned owl, habitat use, home range, Mexican spotted owl, pine-oak forest, radiotelemetry, Strix occidentalis lucida

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page