Skip to Main Content
Performance of a cut-to-length harvester in a single-tree and group selection cutAuthor(s): Neil K. Huyler; Chris LeDoux
Source: Res. Pap. NE-711. Radnor, PA. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 6 p.
Publication Series: Research Paper (RP)
Station: Northeastern Research Station
View PDF (3.22 MB)
DescriptionPresents production and cost data for a mechanized and cut-to-length (CTL) harvester used in a single-tree and group-selection cut on the Groton State Forest in central Vermont. For trees whose average volume (size) was 7 to 18 ft3, production ranged from 464 to 734 ft3 per productive machine hour (PMH). The cycle time for processing trees into bunches to forward to a landing ranged from about 1 minute to 1.72 minutes per tree. There was little above-ground residual stand damage. The cost of the CTL harvesting system was $146.72 per PMH.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHuyler, Neil K.; LeDoux, Chris. 1999. Performance of a cut-to-length harvester in a single-tree and group selection cut. Res. Pap. NE-711. Radnor, PA. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 6 p.
Keywordsharvesting, production, costs, cut-to-length
- Evaluation of a cut-to-length system implementing fuel reduction treatments on the Coconino National Forest in Arizona
- Production and cost analysis of a feller-buncher in central Appalachian hardwood forest
- Cost comparisons for three harvesting systems operating in northern hardwood stands
XML: View XML