Index of Species Information
SPECIES: Elymus macrourus
|
 |
Tufted wheatgrass specimens. Wikimedia Commons image by the Canadian Museum of Nature, hosted by SEINet. |
Introductory
SPECIES: Elymus macrourus
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION:
Sullivan, Janet. 1993. Elymus macrourus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station,
Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/elymac/all.html [].
Revisions:
On 2 October 2018, the common name of this species was changed in FEIS
from: thickspike wheatgrass
to: tufted wheatgrass. The Taxonomy section was updated, and images were
added.
ABBREVIATION:
ELYMAC
SYNONYMS:
Agropyron macrourum (Turcz.) Drobov.
A. sericuem Hitchc.
A. nomokonovii Pop.
Roegneria macroura (Turcz.) Nevskii
Triticum macroura Turcz.
NRCS PLANT CODE:
ELMA7
COMMON NAMES:
tufted wheatgrass
thickspike wheatgrass
thickspike wildrye
thick-spike wild-rye
TAXONOMY:
The scientific name of tufted wheatgrass is Elymus macrourus (Turcz.)
Tsvel. [1]. There is some disagreement over this placement,
however, as is apparent from the number of synonyms. There are no
infrataxa.
Tufted wheatgrass forms hybrids with Siberian wildrye (E. sibiricus)
where they occur together. The sterile hybrid, Elymus x palmerensis
Lepage, has become increasingly abundant and is common along road
systems of south-central Alaska [8]. Tufted wheatgrass also forms
hybrids with foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum); the resulting sterile
hybrid is named hariy-lemma barley (Elyhordeum pilosilemma (Mitchell
& Hodgson) Barkw.) [1,9]. Hybrids with meadow barley (Horeum
brachyantherum), named Elyhordeum jordalii Melderis, also occur [6].
LIFE FORM:
Graminoid
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS:
No special status
OTHER STATUS:
NO-ENTRY
DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE
SPECIES: Elymus macrourus
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION:
Tufted wheatgrass occurs in northwestern North America from subarctic
Alaska east to the Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories. It
also occurs in eastern Siberia [6,10].
 |
Distribution of tufted wheatgrass in North America. Map courtesy of USDA, NRCS. 2018. The PLANTS Database.
National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC. [2018, October 2] [18]. |
ECOSYSTEMS:
FRES11 Spruce - fir
FRES23 Fir - spruce
FRES28 Western hardwoods
STATES:
AK NT YT
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS:
NO-ENTRY
KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS:
NO-ENTRY
SAF COVER TYPES:
222 Black cottonwood - willow
235 Cottonwood - willow
HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES:
Tufted wheatgrass is not used in habitat type classifications. It occurs
in riparian stands with willows (Salix alaxensis, S. pseudocordata),
prickly rose (Rosa acicularis), western river alder (Alnus incana),
highbush cranberry (Viburnum edule), raspberry (Rubus idaeus), northern
bedstraw (Galium boreale), alpine bluegrass (Poa alpina), common
fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium), tilesius wormwood (Artemisia
tilesii), and rough bentgrass (Agrostis scabra) [7].
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
SPECIES: Elymus macrourus
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE:
This wheatgrass is presumably grazed by both livestock and wildlife.
Specific data are lacking in the literature.
PALATABILITY:
NO-ENTRY
NUTRITIONAL VALUE:
Averaged first and second cut nutritional values for tufted wheatgrass are as
follows [17]:
percent of dry weight
crude protein (N x 6.25) 16.8
phosphorus 0.215
potassium 1.78
calcium 0.39
in vitro dry matter digestibility 65.6
COVER VALUE:
NO-ENTRY
VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES:
Tufted wheatgrass can be used for revegetation of disturbed sites,
especially where it is desirable to establish native plants. It is
valuable on sites requiring erosion control. Its ability to establish
rapidly makes tufted wheatgrass useful as a nurse grass for other, more
slowly growing native species [3].
OTHER USES AND VALUES:
NO-ENTRY
OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
In field trials to study the forage potential of native grasses,
tufted wheatgrass had high initial yields but experienced stand
deterioration and serious weed infestation by the third year [17].
BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SPECIES: Elymus macrourus
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS:
Tufted wheatgrass is a native, perennial grass. It is loosely tufted and
sometimes forms short rhizomes. It grows from 15 to 30 inches (40-80
cm) tall. The culms are erect and the spike is slender and narrow
[6,10].
RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM:
Hemicryptophyte
Geophyte
REGENERATION PROCESSES:
Tufted wheatgrass reproduces by seed, with seed set rates from 83 to 100
percent [8,9]. It is self-fertile [9].
Vegetative reproduction occurs through rhizomes [6].
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Tufted wheatgrass occurs on alluvial flats, riverbanks, sand and gravel
bars, and less commonly on hillsides with good drainage and abundant
moisture. It also occurs on coastal precipices, swales in willow
woodlands, roadsides, and gravel banks [8,10,13,15].
SUCCESSIONAL STATUS:
Tufted wheatgrass appears to occur in early seral sites; it is
characteristic of disturbed sites [10,13].
SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT:
NO-ENTRY
FIRE ECOLOGY
SPECIES: Elymus macrourus
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS:
Tufted wheatgrass occurs on sites that are rarely disturbed by fire. As
a perennial grass, it probably has the capacity to sprout after top-kill
by fire.
FIRE REGIMES:
Find fire regime information for the plant communities in which this
species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under
"Find Fire Regimes".
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY:
Tussock graminoid
Ground residual colonizer (on-site, initial community)
Initial-offsite colonizer (off-site, initial community)
FIRE EFFECTS
SPECIES: Elymus macrourus
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT:
Tufted wheatgrass is probably top-killed by fire and may be killed by
severe fires. Specific data on the severity of fire needed to kill
wheatgrass are lacking.
PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE:
As a colonizer of disturbed sites, tufted wheatgrass probably increases after
fire disturbances. Specific data are lacking.
FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
NO-ENTRY
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Elymus macrourus
REFERENCES:
1. Barkworth, Mary E.; Dewey, Douglas R. 1985. Genomically based genera in
the perennial Triticeae of North America: identification and membership.
American Journal of Botany. 72(5): 767-776. [393]
2. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
3. Densmore, Roseann V.; Dalle-Molle, Lois; Holmes, Katherine E. 1990.
Restoration of alpine and subalpine plant communities in Denali National
Park and Preserve, Alaska, U.S.A. In: Hughes, H. Glenn; Bonnicksen,
Thomas M., eds. Restoration `89: the new management challange:
Proceedings, 1st annual meeting of the Society for Ecological
Restoration; 1989 January 16-20; Oakland, CA. Madison, WI: The
University of Wisconsin Arboretum, Society for Ecological Restoration:
509-519. [14720]
4. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
5. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
6. Hulten, Eric. 1968. Flora of Alaska and neighboring territories.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1008 p. [13403]
7. LeResche, R. E.; Bishop, R. H.; Coady, J. W. 1974. Distribution and
habitats of moose in Alaska. Le Naturaliste Canadien. 101: 143-178.
[15190]
8. Mitchell, W. W.; Hodgson, H. J. 1965. The status of hybridization
between Agropyron sericeum and Elymus sibiricus in Alaska. Canadian
Journal of Botany. 43: 855-859. [20871]
9. Murry, Lynn E.; Tai, William. 1980. Genome relations of Agropyron
sericeum, Hordeum jubatum and their hybrids. American Journal of Botany.
67: 1374-1379. [20870]
10. Porsild, A. Erling; Cody, William J. 1980. Vascular Plants of
Continental Northwest Territories, Canada. Ottawa: National Museums of
Canada, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ca. Canada. [Pages
unknown]. [20868]
11. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
12. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]
13. Tsvelev, N. N. 1983. Grasses of the Soviet Union. New Delhi: Oxonian
Press Pvt. Ltd. [Pages unknown]. [20869]
14. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Survey. [n.d.]. NP
Flora [Data base]. Davis, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, National
Biological Survey. [23119]
15. Wiggins, Ira, L.; Thomas, John Hunter. 1962. A flora of the Alaskan
Arctic Slope. Arctic Institute of North America, Sp. Pub. #4. Toronto:
University of Toronto Press. [Pages unknown]. [20867]
16. Viereck, Leslie A. 1970. Forest succession and soil development adjacent
to the Chena River in interior Alaska. Arctic and Alpine Research. 2(1):
1-26. [12466]
17. Mitchell, W. W. 1982. Forage yield and quality of indigenous and
introduced grasses at Palmer, Alaska. Agronomy Journal. 74: 899-905.
[16172]
18. U.S. Department of the Interior, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2018.
PLANTS Database, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service (Producer). Available: https://plants.usda.gov/.
[34262]
FEIS Home Page