Index of Species Information
SPECIES: Eragrostis intermedia
Introductory
SPECIES: Eragrostis intermedia
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION :
Walsh, Roberta A. 1994. Eragrostis intermedia. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station,
Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/eraint/all.html [].
ABBREVIATION :
ERAINT
SYNONYMS :
NO-ENTRY
SCS PLANT CODE :
ERIN
COMMON NAMES :
plains lovegrass
TAXONOMY :
The currently accepted scientific name of plains lovegrass is Eragrostis
intermedia A. S. Hitchc. [25,29,49]. It is in the family Poaceae.
There are no currently accepted infrataxa.
LIFE FORM :
Graminoid
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS :
No special status
OTHER STATUS :
NO-ENTRY
DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE
SPECIES: Eragrostis intermedia
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION :
Plains lovegrass occurs from Florida and Georgia west to Arizona
[19,49]. It extends north into Missouri and eastern Kansas [24,25] and
south through Mexico to Costa Rica [25,29,31].
ECOSYSTEMS :
FRES12 Longleaf - slash pine
FRES15 Oak - hickory
FRES30 Desert shrub
FRES32 Texas savanna
FRES33 Southwestern shrubsteppe
FRES34 Chaparral - mountain shrub
FRES35 Pinyon - juniper
FRES38 Plains grasslands
FRES40 Desert grasslands
STATES :
AL AZ AR FL GA HI KS LA MS MO
NM OK TX MEXICO
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS :
7 Lower Basin and Range
12 Colorado Plateau
13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont
14 Great Plains
KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS :
K023 Juniper - pinyon woodland
K027 Mesquite bosque
K031 Oak - juniper woodlands
K044 Creosotebush - tarbush
K054 Grama - tobosa prairie
K058 Grama - tobosa shrubsteppe
K059 Trans-Pecos shrub savanna
K060 Mesquite savanna
K069 Bluestem - grama prairie
K082 Mosaic of K074 and K100
K085 Mesquite - buffalograss
K100 Oak - hickory forest
K112 Southern mixed forest
SAF COVER TYPES :
40 Post oak - blackjack oak
68 Mesquite
83 Longleaf pine - slash pine
239 Pinyon - juniper
241 Western live oak
242 Mesquite
SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES :
NO-ENTRY
HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES :
Plains lovegrass associates in south-central Arizona desert grasslands
include sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula), sprucetop grama (B.
chondrosioides) and other gramas (Bouteloua spp.), threeawns (Aristida
spp.), muhlys (Muhlenbergia spp.), green sprangletop (Leptochloa dubia),
Arizona cottontop (Digitaria californica), wolftail (Lycurus phleoides),
velvet-pod mimosa (Mimosa dysocarpa), ocotillo (Fouquieria splendens),
Wheeler sotol (Dasylirion wheeleri), sacahuista (Nolina microcarpa),
false-mesquite (Calliandra eriophylla), and larchleaf goldenweed
(Aplopappus laricifolius) [14,15,34,37,47,48].
Associates in interior chaparral of Arizona include shrub live oak
(Quercus turbinella), desert ceanothus (Ceanothus greggii), deerbrush
(Ceanothus integerrimus), pointleaf manzanita (Arctostaphylos pungens),
Pringle manzanita (A. pringlei), silktassels (Garrya spp.), and
Stansbury cliffrose (Purshia mexicana var. stansburiana) [38,43].
Associates of plains lovegrass in the mixed-grass and shortgrass prairie
of the Southwest include buffalo grass (Buchloe dactyloides), Indian
ricegrass (Oryzopsis hymenoides), galleta (Hilaria jamesii), prairie
junegrass (Koeleria macrantha), vine-mesquite (Panicum obtusum), alkali
sacaton (Sporobolus airoides), fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens),
sagebrush (Artemisia spp.), winterfat (Krascheninnikovia lanata), soapweed
yucca (Yucca glauca), and broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae) [12].
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
SPECIES: Eragrostis intermedia
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE :
Plains lovegrass produces quality forage on the grazing lands of Arizona
and New Mexico [23,25,26]. It is an important cattle forage species in
oak woodland of southern Arizona [33]. However, because it has a high
seedstalk to leaf ratio it is a relatively low forage producer [31].
Cattle in south-central Arizona ate plains lovegrass at 45 percent of
availability. Plains lovegrass was intermediate in preference and
production compared to other grasses growing on the range [14].
Upland game birds eat plains lovegrass seeds [31,46].
PALATABILITY :
Plains lovegrass is palatable [46]. Even on steeper slopes it is often
the first species to be grazed [26].
NUTRITIONAL VALUE :
Plains lovegrass was collected in Sutton County, Texas, in 1973.
Nutrient composition (percent) of leaves and stems was as follows [27]:
Water Ash Cell Wall Phosphorus Protein DOM*
July 59 8 70 0.12 7 52
October 54 7 69 0.09 6 50
November 37 9 72 0.11 5 37
*DOM: Digestible Organic Matter
COVER VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES :
NO-ENTRY
OTHER USES AND VALUES :
NO-ENTRY
OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
Plains lovegrass has decreased in abundance in Arizona. This reduction
is probably the result of long-continued grazing. Because of its
palatability and early greening habit, plains lovegrass is often
overgrazed in early spring [26]. To renew its vigor [31] and also allow
for seed production and establishment of seedlings [32], plains lovegrass
should be rested from grazing during July and August about every third
year [31].
In southeastern Arizona, plains lovegrass was measured in 1983 on
grassland ungrazed since 1968 and on adjacent grazed grassland. Plains
lovegrass was increasing on the ungrazed area, but not on adjacent
grazed sites. In an area ungrazed since the early 1950's, plains
lovegrass occurred in dense, nearly pure stands [8]. In the same area
in 1990, plains lovegrass made up 15 percent of canopy cover on ungrazed
quadrats, but only 5 percent on grazed quadrats [5]. The grass canopy
was significantly taller (p<.01) where it was protected from grazing.
Plains lovegrass is not found in pure stands in areas where it is grazed
[31].
Plains lovegrass production in southern Arizona semidesert grasslands is
related to current summer rainfall and also to rainfall during previous
growing periods [32]. (See SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT)
Plains lovegrass in southwestern semidesert grass-shrub ranges is
favored by light to moderate grazing. When overgrazed, the plants lose
vigor, die, and are replaced by less palatable species [32]. Plains
lovegrass is a component of Southern Plains grasslands which, when
overgrazed, are invaded by large-shrub monocultures and/or by short
semishrubs [12]. Plains lovegrass in south-central Arizona grasslands
has been greatly reduced where mesquite (Prosopis spp.) has invaded the
range [37].
In the Southwest, plains lovegrass and other native species do not
reestablish in areas planted with the African species Lehmann and
weeping lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana and E. curvula). In
southeastern Arizona, areas of the Appleton-Whittell Research Sanctuary
were seeded with mixtures of Lehmann and weeping lovegrass in the 1940's
and 1950's. By 1984, African lovegrasses covered more than 50 percent
of the ground; native grass cover was reduced by nearly 60 percent.
Plains lovegrass was one of the indigenous grasses significantly
reduced. Nearby unseeded areas supported mixtures of native herbs,
shrubs, and perennial grasses including plains lovegrass. Since cattle
were removed in 1968, species-rich plant assemblages have developed on
the Sanctuary in all areas except those planted with African lovegrasses
[6].
Plains lovegrass seed is available commercially [17].
BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SPECIES: Eragrostis intermedia
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS :
Plains lovegrass is a native, warm-season, C-4, perennial bunchgrass
[24,31,33,34]. Culms are wiry [19], erect, pith filled to hollow [24],
and 12 to 35 inches (30-90 cm) tall [19]. Leaf blades are 4 to 10
inches [10-25 cm] long [25,26]. The inflorescence is an erect, open,
diffuse, pyramidal panicle [24,25] 6 to 14 inches (15-35 cm) long.
Spikelets are three- to nine-flowered [19,25,31]; the fruit is a
caryopsis [25].
RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM :
Hemicryptophyte
REGENERATION PROCESSES :
Plains lovegrass sprouts from perennating buds at the bases of culms
[24]. It also reproduces by seed [25]. Dispersal occurs when the
large, loose, fruiting stalks detach and tumble across the ground,
releasing seed [8].
Plains lovegrass seeds were collected from plants growing at two
semidesert grassland sites in south-central Arizona, one not irrigated
and one irrigated. Rate of germination was tested 7 months after
harvest. The seeds from irrigated land were germinable (18%) in the
laboratory at moderate temperature alternations representative of wet
seedbeds in April (50/86 degrees Fahrenheit [10/30 deg C]). However,
maximum germination (47%) occurred at temperature alternations of 68/104
degrees Fahrenheit (20/40 deg C), which is similar to wet seedbed
temperature extremes during the summer rainy period when plains
lovegrass usually emerges. Plains lovegrass seeds from unirrigated
plants had much lower germination rates than those from irrigated
plants. Germination response varied with seed collection year [41].
SITE CHARACTERISTICS :
Plains lovegrass is found on dry or sandy prairies [25], dry slopes
[19], rocky hillsides, in canyons [29], open woods [24], and on
disturbed sites [49]. Its occurrence is related to topography, but
varies from one area to another. Plains lovegrass in south-central
Arizona showed a strong positive correlation with slope. Over 60
percent of occurrences were on slopes steeper than 30 percent [14]. In
southeastern Arizona, plains lovegrass on undisturbed grassland occurred
on level to gently rolling uplands [8]. In northwestern Arizona, plains
lovegrass was found on rocky ledges and among boulders in interior
chaparral [13].
Plains lovegrass grows on most soil textures [15,16,20,21,35,36,48]. In
south-central Arizona it is most productive on sands and sandy loams
with weak profile development. It shows intermediate productivity on
soil with well developed horizons and clayey subsoils. It is least
productive on shallow, stony, and cobbly soil [14].
Plains lovegrass often grows in areas where annual precipitation is
bimodal, with a wet season in winter and another in summer. Over half
the annual rainfall usually occurs in summer, when the bulk of plains
lovegrass forage is produced [47,48]. Spring and fall are generally
characterized by drought [48]. Mean annual precipitation usually
exceeds 15.7 inches (400 mm). Winters are mild [11,12].
In Arizona, plains lovegrass is found at elevations from 3,500 to 6,000
feet (1,067-1,829 m) [15,29,36,40]. In New Mexico, it grows at
elevations from 3,800 to 8,500 feet (1,158-2,591 m) [21].
SUCCESSIONAL STATUS :
Plains lovegrass is apparently not tolerant of dense cover. In Arizona,
plains lovegrass is not abundant in interior chaparral with dense crown
cover (>70%) except in the scattered interscrub openings, on rocky
outcrops, or in early postfire succession [38]. Plains lovegrass did
occur in chaparral with shrub cover of 60.5 percent and average herb
cover of 12.4 percent. The sparse herb layer was composed of plains
lovegrass and red brome (Bromus rubens) [43].
SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT :
Plains lovegrass growth starts in early spring; it is one of the first
herbs to green up [31].
Plains lovegrass blooms in spring in central Florida [49] and from June
to September in Arizona [29]. Seed dispersal in Arizona begins in late
summer [8].
A minimum of 2 years is required for plains lovegrass to tiller. Culms
produced during the current summer originated as basal buds that broke
dormancy either during the preceding spring, or more commonly, the
preceding fall. A wet fall, or a wet winter and spring, activates basal
buds and enlarges individual plants. Two good rainfall summers in
succession, or a good rainfall summer preceded by an exceptionally wet
spring, can be expected to produce high forage yields. Production will
be low in drought years because few culms are produced [32].
FIRE ECOLOGY
SPECIES: Eragrostis intermedia
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS :
Plains lovegrass has basal culm buds [24] which may sprout after aerial
portions are burned. If thick tufts form, they may protect the basal
buds from fire damage.
FIRE REGIMES :
Find fire regime information for the plant communities in which this
species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under
"Find Fire Regimes".
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY :
Tussock graminoid
Secondary colonizer - on-site seed
FIRE EFFECTS
SPECIES: Eragrostis intermedia
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT :
Plains lovegrass culms and leaves are killed by fire.
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT :
PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE :
Plains lovegrass frequency decreases the first year after fire [28], but
generally increases thereafter [7,9,48]. Seedstalk production sometimes
increases after fire [48].
Plains lovegrass on native grassland in southeastern Arizona was burned
in a July 16 to 17, 1987, wildfire. When measured in August 1987, it
was reduced to one-third of its prefire cover. However, by August 1988,
plains lovegrass cover had increased over prefire levels. By August
1990, it had increased to twice its prefire cover [4,7].
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE :
Plains lovegrass abundance was lower on burned than unburned sites
during the first growing season after prescribed fire in Kerr County,
Texas. Plateau oak (Quercus fusiformis) and post oak (Q. stellata)
savanna containing plains lovegrass was burned between 12:30 and
1:15 p.m. on February 1, 1982. Air temperature was 55 degrees
Fahrenheit (12.8 deg C), relative humidity was 42 to 48 percent, and
wind speed was 10 to 32 miles per hour (16-51 km/hr). Highest recorded
fire temperatures were at the litter surface. Maximum temperature was
412 degrees Fahrenheit (211 deg C) at the litter surface in the grasslands
surrounding trees. Temperatures above and below the litter surface were
substantially lower. In July and early August 1982, samples from quadrats
in control and burned units were collected. Plains lovegrass biomass was
lower on burned than on control sites. Dominance (lbs/ac), relative
dominance (%), relative frequency, and importance are reported [28]:
Relative Relative
Dom Dom Freq Importance
Plateau Oak Units
Control 10.08 6.12 8.09 7.10
Burn 3.97 3.37 7.69 5.53
Post Oak Units
Control 5.95 3.33 8.70 6.01
Burn 5.43 2.97 6.89 4.92
The Research Project Summary Response of herbaceous vegetation to winter
burning in Texas oak savanna provides information on postfire response of
other herbaceous species in this study.
Plains lovegrass decreased the first growing season following a fire in
south-central Arizona desert grassland, but then increased. In June
1963 a wildfire burned a 17-square-mile area in Pima County near Sasabe,
Arizona. After the fire, study sites were located on burned and
unburned slopes at elevations from 4,000 to 4,400 feet (1,219-1,341 m).
Indicators of plains lovegrass basal area (basal area index) before and
for two growing seasons following the fire showed that plains lovegrass
was at first reduced as a result of the fire. However, by the second
growing season, it equaled or exceeded prefire density [48]:
Basal Area Index
West-facing North-facing East-facing
Sites Sites Sites
Burned Control Burned Control Burned
Prefire 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.8
1963 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.3
1964 1.0 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.8
The numbers of plains lovegrass plants measured along transects
decreased on burned areas in postfire year 1. In postfire year 2,
plains lovegrass numbers increased slightly on control sites, but the
increases on burned sites were significantly greater than on control
sites [48]:
West-facing North-facing East-facing
Sites Sites Sites
Burned Control Burned Control Burned
Prefire 19 18 10 8 29
1963 10 16 9 7 22
1964 76 30 52 25 71
Plains lovegrass on the north slope burned area had significantly more
seedstalks and fewer plants without seedstalks during the second growing
season than did the control area. Plains lovegrass apparently was well
adapted to utilize the above normal winter precipitation of 1963.
Greater seedling survival and larger plants occurred on the north and
west study areas, which received more favorable precipitation, than on
the east study area [48].
Plains lovegrass was more plentiful in recent than old burns in
southwestern Oklahoma prairie and buffalo wallows. Plains lovegrass was
common on plots close to and in buffalo wallows. The wallows and
surrounding land were first prescribed burned in early April 1979; some
were burned again in late February 1982. Sampling occurred between late
June and early July 1982. At the time of sampling all wallows had 2 to
4 inches (5-10 cm) of standing water. Exterior quadrats were placed
just adjacent to wallows for comparison of compositional differences
between wallow and other prairie vegetation. Plains lovegrass was found
only outside the eight buffalo wallows burned in 1972, with average
cover of 43.6 percent. It occurred throughout the six recently burned
wallows (average cover 18.6% on burned land outside the wallows, 17.3%
at the edge of the burned wallows, and 4.0% in the interior of the
burned wallows) [16].
FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
In interior chaparral in Arizona, presettlement fire intervals were
usually 50 to 100 years. Postfire succession is rapid and species
composition is changed little by natural fires [38].
Burning can be used in desert grassland ranges to reduce the number of
shrubs competing with plains lovegrass and other perennial grasses [48].
Grazing should be deferred before burning to insure enough fuel to carry
fire [50,51].
Plains lovegrass was subjected to prescribed fire in ungrazed
southeastern Arizona grassland. The fire had no persistent negative
impact on plains lovegrass density [10].
FIRE CASE STUDY
SPECIES: Eragrostis intermedia
FIRE CASE STUDY CITATION :
Walsh, Roberta A., compiler. 1994. Plains lovegrass response to prescribed fire in an oak/grass
woodland in the Huachuca Mountains, Arizona. In: Eragrostis intermedia. In:
Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov
/database/feis/ [].
REFERENCE :
Bock, Jane H.; Bock, Carl E. 1987. Fire effects following prescribed
burning in two desert ecosystems. Final Report on Cooperative Agreement
No. 28-03-278. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 20 p. [9].
Bock, Jane H.; Bock, Carl E. 1992. Short-term reduction in plant
densities following prescribed fire in an ungrazed semidesert
shrub-grassland. Southwestern Naturalist. 37(1): 49-53. [10].
SEASON/SEVERITY CLASSIFICATION :
spring/moderate
STUDY LOCATION :
Prescribed fires were carried out at the Appleton-Whittell Research
Sanctuary of the National Audubon Society in Santa Cruz County, Arizona.
The field site is located in southeastern Arizona on the west side of
the Huachuca Mountains.
PREFIRE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITY :
Prefire vegetation at the oak woodland site in Lyle Canyon included
Emory oak (Quercus emoryi), Arizona white oak (Q. arizonica), plains
lovegrass (Eragrostis intermedia), sideoats grama (Bouteloua
curtipendula), Texas beardgrass (Andropogon cirratus), Hall's panic
grass (Panicum hallii), longleaf falsegoldeneye (Heliomeris longifolia
var. annua), spreading snakeherb (Dyschoriste decumbens), Louisiana
sagewort (Artemisia ludoviciana), bindweeds (Convolvulus spp.), warty
caltrop (Kallstroemia parviflora), catclaw mimosa (Mimosa biuncifera),
velvet-pod mimosa (M. dysocarpa), and yerba de pasmo (Baccharis
pteronioides).
Prefire vegetation at the grassland site on Bald Hill included plains
lovegrass, wolftail (Lycurus phleoides), threeawns (Aristida spp.),
sprucetop grama (Bouteloua chondrosioides), sideoats grama, spreading
fleabane (Erigeron divergens), shrubby false mallow (Malvastrum
bicuspidatum), dwarf morningglories (Evolvulus spp.), spreading
snakeherb, tanseyleaf aster (Machaeranthera tanacetifolia), catclaw
mimosa, velvet-pod mimosa, and yerba de pasmo.
Prefire vegetation data was collected during August 1983.
TARGET SPECIES PHENOLOGICAL STATE :
Unknown
SITE DESCRIPTION :
The study sites have 17 inches (430 mm) average annual precipitation,
with half to two-thirds occurring between July and September. Elevation
is 4,922 feet (1,500 m). At the time of the study no fires or grazing
had occurred at the sites since 1969.
FIRE DESCRIPTION :
There were five burned plots and five control plots each at the
grassland and woodland sites. All fires were conducted under hot, dry,
relatively calm conditions prior to the onset of summer rains.
Plots in oak woodland were burned between 10:00 a.m. and noon on May 25,
1984. Air temperatures ranged from 90 to 92 degrees Fahrenheit (32-33
deg C). Relative humidity varied from 16 to 18 percent. Winds were
variable, gusting from 5 to 10 miles per hour (8-16 km/hr). Fine dead
fuel moisture was estimated at between 5 and 6 percent. In four of the
five burned plots, fires moved slowly (1.6 to 4.9 feet per minute
[0.5-1.5 m/min]) with flame lengths of 0.7 to 1.6 feet (0.2-0.5 m) and
fireline intensities of 8-58 kW/m. In the fifth plot the fire moved
very rapidly (about 98 feet per minute [30 m/min]) with fireline
intensity of 260 kW/m.
Semidesert grassland plots were burned between 10:00 and 11:30 a.m. on
June 12, 1984. Air temperatures ranged from 84 to 88 degrees Fahrenheit
(29-31 deg C). Relative humidity varied from 13 to 16 percent. Winds
were variable, gusting from 5 to 22 miles per hour (8-35 km/hr). Fires
moved slowly on all burned plots (3.3-13.1 feet per minute [1-4 m/min])
with flame lengths ranging from 2.6 to 4.6 feet (0.8-1.4 m). These
fires produced fireline intensities of 160 to 540 kW/m.
FIRE EFFECTS ON TARGET SPECIES :
Prefire vegetation data were collected on all plots during summer 1983.
Postfire data were collected on the burned plots and their controls
during the summers of 1984 and 1985. All vegetation sampling was
carried out in August, the time of maximum growth during the summer wet
period. Density and plant height were recorded within each quadrat each
year, as were bare ground cover and overall aboveground plant biomass.
In oak woodland plots, plains lovegrass densities on burned and control
plots were similar prior to the fires. Plains lovegrass declined
significantly (p<0.5) in density on burned plots in the first postfire
growing season of 1984, but this difference had disappeared by the
growing season of 1985.
In semidesert grassland plots, plains lovegrass densities on burned and
control plots were similar prior to the fires. Plains lovegrass
declined significantly (p<.01) in density on burned plots in 1984, the
first postfire growing season, but this difference had disappeared by
the second postfire year.
FIRE MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS :
Plains lovegrass usually declines the first growing season after fire,
but by the second growing season it has regained or exceeded its
original cover. This fire study was part of an extensive of body of
research on fire effects in semidesert grassland, oak savanna, and
Madrean oak woodlands of southeastern Arizona. See the
Research Project Summary of this work for more information on burning
conditions, fires, and fire effects on more than 100 species of plants,
birds, small mammals, and grasshoppers.
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Eragrostis intermedia
REFERENCES :
1. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
2. Bock, Carl E.; Bock, Jane H. 1990. Effects of fire on wildlife in
southwestern lowland habitats. In: Krammes, J. S., technical
coordinator. Effects of fire management of Southwestern natural
resources: Proceedings of the symposium; 1988 November 15-17; Tucson,
AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-191. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station: 50-64. [11273]
3. Bock, Carl E.; Bock, Jane H. 1991. Response of grasshoppers (Orthoptera:
Acrididae) to wildfire in a southeastern Arizona grassland. American
Midland Naturalist. 125: 162-167. [15598]
4. Bock, Carl E.; Bock, Jane H. 1992. Response of birds to wildfire in
native versus exotic Arizona grassland. Southwestern Naturalist. 37(1):
73-81. [18594]
5. Bock, Carl E.; Bock, Jane H. 1993. Cover of perennial grasses in
southeastern Arizona in relation to livestock grazing. [Journal name
unknown]. 7(2): 371-377. [22152]
6. Sorenson, Frank C.; Adams, W. T. 1993. Self fertility and natural
selfing in three Oregon Cascade populations of lodgepole pine. In:
Lindgren, D., ed. Pinus contorta--from untamed forest to domesticated
crop; Proceedings of a meeting with IUFRO working party S2.02-06: Pinus
contorta provenances and breeding and Frans Kempe symposium; 1992 August
24-28; Umea, Sweden. Umea, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural
Sciences, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology: [Report
11]: 358-374. [8790]
7. Bock, J. H.; Bock, C. E. 1992. Vegetation responses to wildfire in
native versus exotic Arizona grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science.
3: 439-446. [20082]
8. Bock, Jane H.; Bock, Carl E. 1986. Habitat relationships of some native
perennial grasses in southeastern Arizona. Desert Plants. 8(1): 3-14.
[478]
9. Bock, Jane H.; Bock, Carl E. 1987. Fire effects following prescribed
burning in two desert ecosystems. Final Report on Cooperative Agreement
No. 28-03-278. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 20 p.
[12321]
10. Bock, Jane H.; Bock, Carl E. 1992. Short-term reduction in plant
densities following prescribed fire in an ungrazed semidesert
shrub-grassland. Southwestern Naturalist. 37(1): 49-53. [18651]
11. Brown, David E. 1982. Madrean evergreen woodland. In: Brown, David E.,
ed. Biotic communities of the American Southwest--United States and
Mexico. Desert Plants. 4(1-4): 59-65. [8886]
12. Brown, David E. 1982. Plains and Great Basin grasslands. In: Brown,
David E., ed. Biotic communities of the American Southwest--United
States and Mexico. Desert Plants. 4(1-4): 115-121. [536]
13. Butterwick, Mary; Parfitt, Bruce D.; Hillyard, Deborah. 1992. Vascular
plants of the northern Hualapai Mountains, Arizona. Journal of the
Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science. 24-25: 31-49. [18327]
14. Cable, Dwight R.; Martin, S. Clark. 1975. Vegetation responses to
grazing, rainfall, site condition, and mesquite control on semidesert
range. Res. Pap. RM-149. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. 24 p. [4887]
15. Canfield, R. H. 1948. Perennial grass composition as an indicator of
condition of Southwestern mixed grass ranges. Ecology. 29: 190-204.
[5308]
16. Collins, Scott L.; Uno, Gordon E. 1983. The effect of early spring
burning on vegetation in buffalo wallows. Bulletin of the Torrey
Botanical Club. 110(4): 474-481. [4352]
17. Davenport Seed Corporation. 1993. Davenport Seed Corporation catalog.
Davenport, WA. 24 p. [21135]
18. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
19. Fernald, Merritt Lyndon. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. [Corrections
supplied by R. C. Rollins]. Portland, OR: Dioscorides Press. 1632 p.
(Dudley, Theodore R., gen. ed.; Biosystematics, Floristic & Phylogeny
Series; vol. 2). [14935]
20. Frost, William E.; Smith, E. Lamar. 1991. Biomass productivity and range
condition on range sites in southern Arizona. Journal of Range
Management. 44(1): 64-67. [14974]
21. Gay, Charles W., Jr.; Dwyer, Don D. 1965. New Mexico range plants.
Circular 374. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University, Cooperative
Extension Service. 85 p. [4039]
22. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
23. Gould, Frank W.; Shaw, Robert B. 1983. Grass systematics. 2d ed. College
Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press. 397 p. [5667]
24. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains.
Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
25. Hitchcock, A. S. 1951. Manual of the grasses of the United States. Misc.
Publ. No. 200. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Research Administration. 1051 p. [2nd edition revised by
Agnes Chase in two volumes. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.]. [1165]
26. Humphrey, Robert R. 1970. Arizona range grasses: Their description,
forage value and management. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona
Press. 159 p. [5567]
27. Huston, J. E.; Rector, B. S.; Merrill, L. B.; Engdahl, B. S. 1981.
Nutritional value of range plants in the Edwards Plateau region of
Texas. Report B-1375. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University System,
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. 16 p. [4565]
28. Hutcheson, Ann-Marie; Baccus, John T.; McClean, Terry M.; Fonteyn, Paul
J. 1989. Response of herbaceous vegetation to prescribed burning in the
Hill Country of Texas. Texas Journal of Agriculture and Natural
Resources. 3: 42-47. [17777]
29. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock,
Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2d ed. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
30. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
31. Leithead, Horace L.; Yarlett, Lewis L.; Shiflet, Thomas N. 1971. 100
native forage grasses in 11 southern states. Agric. Handb. 389.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 216 p.
[17552]
32. Martin, S. Clark. 1975. Ecology and management of Southwestern
semidesert grass-shrub ranges: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap.
RM-156. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 39 p.
[1538]
33. McClaran, Mitchel P.; Allen, Larry S.; Ruyle, George B. 1992. Livestock
production and grazing management in the encinal oak woodlands of
Arizona. In: Ffolliott, Peter F.; Gottfried, Gerald J.; Bennett, Duane
A.; [and others], technical coordinators. Ecology and management of oak
and associated woodlands: perspectives in the sw United States & n
Mexico: Proceedings; 1992 April 27-30; Sierra Vista, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep.
RM-218. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 57-64.
[19743]
34. McPherson, Guy R. 1992. Ecology of oak woodlands in Arizona. In:
Ffolliott, Peter F.; Gottfried, Gerald J.; Bennett, Duane A.; [and
others], technical coordinators. Ecology and management of oak and
associated woodlands: perspectives in the sw United States & n Mexico:
Proceedings; 1992 April 27-30; Sierra Vista, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-218.
Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky
Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 24-33. [19737]
35. Moir, William H. 1979. Soil-vegetation patterns in the central
Peloncillo Mountains, New Mexico. American Midland Naturalist. 102(2):
317-331. [4634]
36. Nyandiga, Charles O.; McPherson, Guy R. 1992. Germination of two
warm-temperature oaks, Quercus emoryi and Quercus arizonica. Canadian
Journal of Forest Research. 22: 1395-1401. [19685]
37. Parker, Kenneth W.; Martin, S. Clark. 1952. The mesquite problem on
southern Arizona ranges. Circular No. 908. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Agriculture. 70 p. [3350]
38. Pase, Charles P.; Brown, David E. 1982. Interior chaparral. In: Brown,
David E., ed. Biotic communities of the American Southwest--United
States and Mexico. Desert Plants. 4(1-4): 95-99. [1826]
39. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
40. Reynolds, Hudson G. 1962. Some characteristics and uses of Arizona's
major plant communities. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. 2:
62-71. [1959]
41. Roundy, Bruce A.; Young, James A.; Sumrall, Lee B.; Livingston,
Margaret. 1992. Laboratory germination responses of 3 love-grasses to
temperature in relation to seedbed temperatures. Journal of Range
Management. 45(3): 306-311. [16430]
42. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]
43. Szaro, Robert C. 1981. Bird population responses to converting chaparral
to grassland and riparian habitats. Southwestern Naturalist. 26(3):
251-256. [13675]
44. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1994. Plants
of the U.S.--alphabetical listing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 954 p. [23104]
45. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Survey. [n.d.]. NP
Flora [Data base]. Davis, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, National
Biological Survey. [23119]
46. Voigt, P. W.; Oaks, Wendall. 1985. Lovegrasses, dropseeds, and other
desert and subtropical grasses. In: Range plant improvement in western
North America: Proceedings of a symposium at the annual meeting of the
Society for Range Management; 1985 February 14; Salt Lake City, UT.
Denver, CO: Society for Range Management: 70-79. [4387]
47. Wallmo, O. C. 1955. Vegetation of the Huachuca Mountains, Arizona.
American Midland Naturalist. 54: 466-480. [20325]
48. White, Larry D. 1965. The effects of a wildfire on a desert grassland
community. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. 107 p. Thesis. [5552]
49. Wunderlin, Richard P. 1982. Guide to the vascular plants of central
Florida. Tampa, FL: University Presses of Florida, University of South
Florida. 472 p. [13125]
50. Bohrer, Vorsila L. 1992. New life from ashes II: A tale of burnt brush.
Desert Plants. 10(3): 122-125. [18805]
51. Humphrey, Robert R. 1974. Fire in the deserts and desert grassland of
North America. In: Kozlowski, T. T.; Ahlgren, C. E., eds. Fire and
ecosystems. New York: Academic Press: 365-400. [14064]
FEIS Home Page
