| Contents
Printable
Format (.pdf)
Executive
Summary
Background
Features
of Unit Tested
Setting
for the Test
Results
Data
Summary
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
&
Further
Information |
Data Summary
Beyond the one broken leg,
no influence to the well-being of the sheep wearing the collars was ever
observed. The herders never expressed concern, and in fact, seemed genuinely
interested in the technology. For the purpose of the test, the information
was not intended to be applied to 2001 allotment permit administration,
but only in the use and utility of the technology.
Over the 128 days between
early June and mid-October 2001, the sheep fitted with the collars traveled
232 miles (373 kilometers). Their routes depict a slow, deliberate circulation
through the allotment—up and down drainages, and ascending and descending
several ridges. Nearly half of the total grazing season was spent between
7,000 and 7,500 feet (2,134 and 2,286 meters) on the valley floor, and
less than 5 percent above 9,000 feet (2,743 meters).
 |
The two collars attempted
2,288 satellite position fixes over the duration of the test. Of these,
94 percent were successful. When a failure occurs, the collar records a
descriptor of the most likely cause. Of the causes listed, the lack of
at least three satellites was the most common, followed by the threshold
for dilution of precision (DOP—basically the uncertainty in position resulting
from the particular geometry of the satellite constellation) being exceeded. |
Over the test period,
failures were most common in July. On a daily basis, failures were most
common during the late morning to afternoon period. It can be speculated
that both of these tendencies are related to overhead obstructions (i.e.,
trees). When trees were more dominant in the landscape, position failures
were more common. Day to day, sheep seek shade during the peak heat periods,
and generally bed in the open during the night. The most successful fix
periods of the day occurred at night between 10:00 p.m. and 4:00 a.m. (See
table 5)
| Some subtle differences
between the individual sheep wearing the collars may be evident in the
data. The sheep wearing collar 378 appears to have routinely ascended higher
when grazing ridge-tops, and was quicker to enter mid-day cover than the
sheep wearing collar 379. The grazing habitats of neither sheep appear
to have had any effect on the integrity of the collars. Post-inspection
of the collars revealed nothing beyond expected scuffs and scratches on
the external case. (See figure 1.) |
Table 5: Summary of position fix
success
| Collar |
378
|
379
|
| fix frequency |
4 hours
|
2 hours
|
| total attempts |
763
|
1,525
|
| total successful |
709
|
1,431
|
| percent
successful |
93
|
94
|
| percent
of memory capacity used |
8
|
15
|
|
Figure 1: Collar 378 full
season GPS position results

The only difference tested
between the two collars was the sampling frequency. The results are a matter
of fractal resolution. The path of the sheep wearing collar 379, which
sampled at twice the temporal resolution of collar 378, would appear to
wander to a greater extent than did 378. In fact, for the full season,
the plotted route of collar 378 is 176 miles compared to 232 miles for
collar 379, or only 76 percent. This difference, however, is more likely
a simple expression of the greater temporal resolution of collar 379. Figure
2 displays comparative routes recorded by the collars during September
16 and 17, 2001. These dates are a random example, with the exception that
all position fix attempts were successful for both collars over the 48-hour
period.
Figure 2—Comparison between
position sampling frequencies of Collars 378 (4 hour) and 379 (2 hour).

The example in Figure 2 demonstrates
both the natural variation between animals, as well as the more detailed
route of collar 379 with the greater temporal resolution.
|