Back | Next | Home
Missoula Technology &
Development Center
|
Table
of Contents | Glossary Back | Next | Home |
Missoula Technology & Development Center |
Estimating Methods, Variability, and Sampling for Drop-Test Data
Figure 2 illustrates a 600- by 155-foot grid. A total of 544 stakes were driven into the ground so their tops were 4 feet high. The stakes were staggered to reduce the distance between known and unknown points.
Examination of hundreds of past drops showed that the rate of change in coverage level was often greater crossrange (perpendicular to the flight path) than downrange (in the direction of the flight path), especially for drops at high speeds. How close should the cups be placed to capture this feature of ground patterns? To answer this question, the spacing was decreased from 10 feet to 5 feet for three crossrange rows (figure 2). The effectiveness of the 5-foot spacing was compared to the 10-foot spacing.
Figure 2—Diagram of the test grid.
After a drop is made, any cup with moisture in it is capped. The row and column numbers are written on the lid, identifying the location of the cup in the grid. All the cups with lids on them are removed and taken to be weighed. Clean cups are put back out on the grid for the next drop (figure 3).
Figure 3—Grid workers gathering cups after a drop.
 E-mail: wo_mtdc_webmaster@fs.fed.us |
Back | Next Table of Contents Glossary Cover Page |
Missoula Technology & Development Center |