Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

USDA Logo U.S. Department of Agriculture

Publication Details

Title:
Wildfire risk under alternative fuel management strategies: spatial datasets of in situ and transmitted risk for populated areas in north-central New Mexico and Sierra Mountain Range within California Data publication contains GIS data
Author(s):
Vogler, Kevin C.; Thompson, Matthew P.; Scott, Joe H.; Miller, Carol
Publication Year:
2022
How to Cite:
These data were collected using funding from the U.S. Government and can be used without additional permissions or fees. If you use these data in a publication, presentation, or other research product please use the following citation:
Vogler, Kevin C.; Thompson, Matthew P.; Scott, Joe H.; Miller, Carol. 2022. Wildfire risk under alternative fuel management strategies: spatial datasets of in situ and transmitted risk for populated areas in north-central New Mexico and Sierra Mountain Range within California. Fort Collins, CO: Forest Service Research Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2022-0026
Abstract:
Simulation modeling was used to examine tradeoffs and synergies between hypothetical post-treatment conditions generated according to distinct treatment prioritization schemes (Housing Protection, Federal Risk Transmission, Random) and variable treatment extents. We used stochastic wildfire simulation and computations of exposure to wildfire to compare strategy performance across two very large landscapes - the southern Sierra in California (approximately 28 million acres) and northern New Mexico (approximately 21 million acres). This data publication represents the model results for the two study areas analyzed as well as all input data required to reproduce our analysis. All input data and simulation model parameters were calibrated to represent conditions within the two study areas in 2015.

Keywords:
burn probability; fire likelihood; fire modeling; fire planning; FLPGen; FSim; fuels management; hazard; Landscape Treatment Designer; risk assessment; wildfire; wildfire exposure; wildfire transmission; wildland-urban interface; fire suppression; forest management; biota; environment; planningCadastre; Ecology, Ecosystems, & Environment; Environment and People; Fire; Fire ecology; Fire suppression, pre-suppression; Wildland/urban interface; Inventory, Monitoring, & Analysis; Assessments; Natural Resource Management & Use; Landscape management; California; New Mexico; United States
Related publications:
  • Thompson, Matthew P.; Vogler, Kevin C.; Scott, Joe H.; Miller, Carol. 2022. Comparing risk-based fuel treatment prioritization with alternative strategies for enhancing protection and resource management objectives. Fire Ecology. 18(26). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-022-00149-0 https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/66231
  • Miller, Carol; Vogler, Kevin C.; Scott, Joe H.; Thompson, Matthew P. 2021. Can landscape fuel treatments enhance both protection and resource management objectives?. Joint Fire Science Program Final Report. Project ID: 17-1-01-4. (Available in data publication download: \Supplements\17-1-01-4_final_report.pdf). https://www.firescience.gov/projects/17-1-01-4/project/17-1-01-4_final_report.pdf
Metrics:
Visit count : 421
Access count: 3
Download count: 29
More details
Data Access:

Need information about Using our Formats?