Monitoring
Guidance for monitoring within 4FRI comes from the 1st 4FRI EIS Monitoring and Adaptive Management Plan as well as the Rim Country Monitoring Management Plan. Monitoring helps inform 4FRI's implementation strategies.
Background: In 2010, the Four Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI) was selected for funding under the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program (CFLRP). The purpose of the CFLRP has been to encourage collaborative, science-based ecosystem restoration of priority forest landscapes. 4FRI is no longer considered a CFLRP landscape and has met its commitment for CFLRP Annual Reports.
Today: A multi-party monitoring is used to determine the ecological, social, and economic effects of management actions within the project landscape. A Multiparty Monitoring Board within the 4FRI Stakeholder Group was established to monitor and evaluate effects.The members provide support and expertise in the development and implementation of ecological and socioeconomic monitoring. This group also helps evaluate and communicate the results of monitoring activities to stakeholders and to the public.
The Multiparty Monitoring Board strives to represent a variety of interests and partners. Members currently include: Arizona Game and Fish Department; Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management; Campbell Global; Center for Biological Diversity; Ecological Restoration Institute; Grand Canyon Trust; Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership; Mottek Consulting; Salt River Project; The Nature Conservancy; The U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station; and Trout Unlimited.
Adaptive Management
The intent of monitoring is to link land management actions and outcomes with learning. Monitoring is a valuable tool that can help the 4FRI adapt its management practices based on the effects of previous activities. The Forest Service and the stakeholder group collaboratively developed two monitoring and adaptive management plans, for the 1st 4FRI Environmental Impact Statement and the Rim Country Project, to describe how the Forest Service and its partners will monitor effects of 4FRI restoration treatments and, based on changing conditions and new information, how future actions will be adapted to achieve desired results.
Current Activities
In partnerships with organizations like the Landscape Conservation Initiative at Northern Arizona University, the Bird Conservancy of the Rockies, and The Nature Conservancy, ecological monitoring is already underway covering issues ranging from changes in forest vegetation to changes in songbird communities. The health and condition of springs across the 4FRI are being monitored by the Spring Stewardship Institute of the Museum of Northern Arizona.
Through the efforts of other partner organizations such as the Grand Canyon Trust and Trout Unlimited, volunteer citizen scientists are being brought together to help the Forest Service assess the condition of various streams and springs throughout the 4FRI landscape. These assessments will help the Forest Service develop and implement restoration plans that will improve the quality and resilience of these valuable wildlife habitats.
Since many biophysical monitoring efforts include gathering data on both pre-treatment conditions and post-treatment activities, results can take some time to finalize. As monitoring reports are completed, they will be posted below.
Monitoring Reports
Wildlife
- Assessing the Feasibility of Using Citizen Science for Songbird Monitoring-Rocky Mt Resarch Station 2019
- Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 2015 Field Season Report
- Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 2016 Field Season Report
- Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 2020 songbird monitoring report
- Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 2022 songbird monitoring report
- Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 2023 songbird montioring report
- 4FRI Mexican Spotted Owl Monitoring Annual Report 2015
- 4FRI Mexican Spotted Owl Monitoring Annual Report 2016
- 4FRI Mexican Spotted Owl Monitoring Annual Report 2017
- 4FRI Mexican Spotted Owl Monitoring Annual Report 2018
- 4FRI Mexican Spotted Owl Monitoring Annual Report 2019
- 4FRI Mexican Spotted Owl Monitoring Annual Report 2020
- 4FRI Mexican Spotted Owl Monitoring Annual Report 2021
- 4FRI Mexican Spotted Owl Monitoring Annual Report 2022
- 4FRI Mexican Spotted Owl Monitoring Annual Report 2023
- Northern Goshawk Monitoring in the 4FRI: 2015 Field Season Report
Mexican Spotted Owl Annual Reports: View required annual protected activity center (PAC) monitoring reports for the 4FRI Phase 1 Mexican Spotted Owl Management Experiment--a collaboration between the four 4FRI forests and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to study the effects of forest management activities in occupied owl habitat. Within this managment experiment, MSO surveys were completed by the Coconino National Forest's Flagstaff Ranger District.
Mexican Spotted Owl Checklists: As part of the Forest Service Region 3 Mexican Spotted Owl Recovery Strategy, pre-implementation checklists are required to be made available to the public before the implementation of a project.
Water
- NAU 2020 Annual Report Hart Prairie and Big Spring Monitoring
- Springs Stewardship Institute 2019 Spring Monitoring Plan
- Springs Stewardship Institute 2019 Springs Health Monitoring Annual Progress Report
- Springs Stewardship Institute 2020 Springs Health Monitoring Annual Progress Report
- Springs Stewardship Institute 2021 Springs Health Monitoring Annual Progress Report
- Springs Stewardship Institute 2022 Springs Health Monitoring Annual Progress Report
Vegetation
- 4FRI Rapid Plot Monitoring Overview and Analysis 2016-2021
- 2015 4FRI Treatment Effectiveness Monitoring
- 4FRI Landscape Pattern Analysis April 2017
- 4FRI Rapid Plot Pre-Treatment Monitoring Report 2019
- Models and Maps of Pronghorn Habitat Quality and Connectivity to Inform 4FRI Monitoring and Vegetation Treatment in Northern Arizona 2019
Socioeconomic
- The Forest Service's TREAT analysis documents are under review prior to posting