Ecoshare CCAMP
Central Cascades Adaptive Management Partnership
Mission Statement: The Central Cascades Adaptive Management Partnership (CCAMP or Partnership) creates opportunities for scientists and managers to engage in mutual learning and solution exploration related to complex natural resource challenges on federal lands, with attention to our relationships with all lands.
Emphasis Areas: The Partnership focuses on issues related to managing for resilient landscapes in the face of climate variability and understanding the connections society has with natural resources.
Niche: The Partnership facilitates the development and use of both science and management principles to support credible land management decisions.
Deliverables: CCAMP provides platforms for education and mutual learning about forest management, including informal field trips, forums, workshops, and synthesis products. The Partnership also engages in joint administrative studies and demonstration projects on-the-ground.
Decision Making: CCAMP uses a consensus process for making decisions within its Steering Committee. Quarterly meetings provide opportunities for discussion on program of work, priorities and emphasis areas and inter-agency coordination.
- For the Manager - Research has shown that the preferred method for dissemination of science findings is through direct interaction among peers, researchers, and practitioners in the field. Increased workloads and decreased budgets are currently barriers to practitioners staying current with research findings. CCAMP provides venues for communication between researchers and managers through efficient use of synthesis, screening of publications for relevant findings, and arranging issue-specific field discussions.
- Accessibility and thoughtful use of directly relevant science by practitioners allows for management decisions with stronger foundations.
- For the Scientist - The interaction between scientists and practitioners/managers provides opportunities to identify mutual interests, improve understanding of both technically and socially complex issues, and help scientists understand why “the best science” doesn't always drive decisions. It provides a sense of direction for future research and gives an opportunity to discus application potential.
- Mutual Benefits - CCAMP helps the science and management communities “think outside of our worlds,” make new connections, and explore upcoming issues. From these collaborative efforts, suggestions for new management approaches have both science credibility and management credibility (i.e., they are operationally and economically feasible).
Image
- Forest Service, Willamette National Forest - Forest Supervisor, Deputy Forest Supervisor, Natural Resources Staff, Forest Silviculturist, Public Affairs Officer, Recreation Staff, and District Rangers for the Detroit, Sweet Home, McKenzie River, and Middle Fork Ranger Districts.
- Forest Service, PNW Research Station Corvallis - USFS's Lead Scientist for H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest and the Ecosystem Processes Team Leader.
- BLM - District Manager, Planner, and Upper Willamette Field Manager for the Eugene BLM; and the Science Liaison from the BLM State Office.
- OSU - OSU's Lead Scientist for Andrews' Long Term Ecosystem Research Program (LTER), and the Director of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
- U of O - Institute for a Sustainable Environment
- USGS - Forest and Range Ecology Science Center
Aquatic Studies
Aerial Survey of the Upper McKenzie River - FLIR Report
Social Science Studies
Landscape Studies
Meadow Studies
Synthesis Papers & Tools and Talks
- Carbon Storage on the WNF
- Best Available Science - Thinning Response Varies by Age of Stand
- Best Available Science - Gaps
- Best Available Science - Thinning and Dead Wood
- Early Seral Forest Ecosystem Vertebrates for W. OR and W. WA
- Early Seral Forest: A Conservation Conundrum - Friesen
- Roosevelt Elk Forage: Plant Community Relationships and Treatment Response Tool Guide & Tables
- Visual Silvicultural Prescription Library V. 1.0 2015 CAMP WNF
- Visual Silvicultural Prescription Library PPT Companion v. 1.0 2015
- Early Seral in Moist Forests of the Pacific Northwest - Scott H. Harris and Matthew G. Betts
- Harris - Early Seral Bibilo - Dec 2017
- R6_Hydro_Methods_20180220_Wil_20180420
Created wildlife tree literature
- Angers et al 2011 Tree mortality and snag dynamics in NA boreal tree species after wildfire
- Arnette et al 2010 Avian foraging and nesting use of created snags
- Bagne et al 2008 Prescribed fire - snag pop dynamics and avian nest site selection
- Baker et al 1996 Inoculating trees with wood decay fungi with rifle shotgun
- Barry et al 2017 Long-term dynamics created snags habitat
- Barry et al 2018 Use of Created Snags by Cavity-Nesting Birds
- Bednarz et al 2004 Emerging concepts and research directions in study of cavity nesting birds_keystone processes
- Bednarz et al 2013 The efficacy of fungal inoculation of live trees to create wood decay wildlife-use trees in managed forests
- Boleyn et al 1999 Created snag monitoring on the Willamette National Forest
- Boleyn et al 2002 Created snag monitoring on the Willamette NF in PSW GTR 181 Harmon, M
- Brandeis et al 2002 Cavity nester habitat artificial DF created snags
- Brown et al 2013 Natural tree regen and coarse woody debris dynamics w cascade range post fire
- Bull 1980 Longevity of snags and their use by woodpeckers
- Bull and Partridge 1986 Methods of killing trees for use by cavity nesters
- Bull et al 1981 Creating snags with explosives pnw_rn393
- Bunnell et al 2002 How should we spatially distribute dead and dying wood
- Carey and Sanders 1981 Routing to accelerate tree-cavity formation
- Carlsson et al 2016 Boxing For Biodiversity Evaluation of an artificially created decaying wood habitat
- Chambers and Mast 2005 Ponderosa pine snag dynamics and cavity exc following wildfire in AZ
- Chambers et al 1997 Artificially created Douglas-fir snags Oregon
- Coates 1997 Windthrow damage 2 years after partial cutting
- Cockle et al 2012 Linking fungi, trees, and hole-using birds in a Neotropical tree-cavity network
- Cox 2009 Cottage Grove snag inventory unpub
- Davis et al 1983 Snag habitat management_proceedings of the symposium_GTR RN99 (DOC, PDF)
- Davis et al 2018 Northern Spotted Owl Nest Tree Summary
- DeGraff 1980 Management of western forests and grasslands
- Dodds et al 2016 Enhancing stand structure thru snag creation in NE US using ethanol injections and bark beetle pheromones
- Doerr 2008 Evaluation of wildlife tree creation on the WNF (unpub)
- Dunn and Bailey 2012 Temporal dynamics decay of course wood in early seral dry mixed conifer eastern Oregon
- Dunn and Bailey 2016 Tree mortality and structural change following mix sev fire in DF forest OR
- Edworthy and Martin 2014 Long-term dynamics of the characteristics of tree cavities used
- Edworthy et al 2012 Survival analysis of a critical resource for cavity‐nesting communities_ patterns of tree cavity longevity
- Evans and Connor 1999 Snag Management
- Everett et al 1999 Snag dynamics in a chronosequence of 26 wildfires east slope cascades WA
- Farris et al 2004 the role of foraging woodpeckers in decomp of pp snags
- Filip et al 2004 Artificial inoculation
- Filip et al 2011 Effects inoculation in OR WA
- Fischer and McClelland 1983 A Cavity-Nesting Bird Bibliography Including Related Titles on Forest Snags, Fire, Insects, Disease, and Decay
- Foster et al 1998 Landscape patterns and legacies resulting from lg infrequent forest disturbances
- Gainey et al 2015 Mark recapture rates snags AZ
- Garber et al 2005 Snag longevity under alternative silv regimes Maine
- Gustafsson et al 2010 Tree retention as a conservation measure in clear cut forests of N Europe
- Gustafsson et al 2012 Retention Forestry to Maintain Multifunctional Forests A World Perspective
- Gyug and Bennett 1996 Bird use of wildlife tree patches 25 yrs after clearcutting
- Hagar et al 2013 Wildlife Use of Created Snags draft1
- Hagglund and Hjalten 2018 Substrate specific restoration promotes saproxylic beetle diversity in boreal forest set-asides
- Hallett et al 2001 Decay dynamics and avian use
- Hane et al 2012 Experimental effects of structural enrichment on nest survival
- Hane et al 2019 Survival dynamics of mechanically topped DF WH
- Harrington 1996 Fall rates of prescribed fire killed ponderosa pine
- Hildebrand et al 2006 Inoculation monitoring Siuslaw NF unpub
- Holden et al 2006 Ponderosa pine snag densities following fires NM
- Hood et al 2010 Predicting mortality for 5 CA conifers following wildfire
- Hope and McComb 1994 Perceptions of implementing and monitoring wildlfire tree prescriptions
- Huff and Bailey 2009 Longevity and dynamics of fatally and non fatally topped DF
- Huggard 1997 Fall down rates of subalpine fir snags BC
- Hunt and Etheridge 1995 True Heart rots of Pacific Region Canada
- Huss 2002 et al Efficacy of inoculating fungi W WA
- Hutto 2006 Toward Meaningful Snag-Management Guidelines for salvage logging
- Jackman 1975 Woodpeckers and their role in the PNW
- Jackson and Jackson 2004 Cavity nester fungi woodpecker cavity sites
- Jusino et al 2015 Heart rot hotel fungal communities in red cockaded wp
- Kilgo and Vukovich 2014 Can snag creation benefit a primary cavity nester_abundance pulse
- Klenner and Huggard 1997 Sicamous Creek Silvicultural Systems Project
- Korol et al 2002 Snags and Down Wood in the ICBMP
- Kroll et al 2012 Research needs
- Kroll et all 2012 Landscape composition influences colonization of created snags
- Lehmkuhl et al 2003 Cavities in snags along a wildfire chronosequence in E WA
- Lewis 1998 Creating snags and wildlife trees in commercial landscapes
- Linden et al 2012 Conserving avian richness through structure retention in forests of the Pacific Northwest
- Lohmus 2011 Silviculture as a disturbance regime the effects of clear cutting planting and thinning on polypore communities in mixed forests
- Lohmus 2016 Habitat indicators for cavity nesters polypore Phellinus p in pine forests
- Lorenz 2018 Study Plan
- Lorenz and Jusino 2017 Fungal communities in woodpecker cavities at Pringle Falls Experimental Forest
- Lorenz and Jusino 2018 Mechanisms of wood decay in PNW snags
- Lorenz et al 2015 Wood Hard Limit Nest Selection
- Lutz 2005 The contribution of mortality to early conif forest development
- Lyon 1977 Attrition of lodgepole pine snags on sleeping child burn MT
- Macguire and Chambers 2005 Ecological and socioeconomic response to alt silv treatments
- Manning and Friesen 2013 YSTDS Establishment Report
- Martin et al 2004 Nest sites and nest webs BC
- Maziarz et al 2017 Microclimate in tree cavities and nest boxes_implication
- Morrison 1978 Use of high cut stumps by birds
- Parish et al 2010 Snag longevity DF WH WRC permanent plots in BC
- Parks et al 1999 Woodpecker use and fall rates pp infected with mistletoe
- Pasanen et al 2018 Life after tree death_ Does restored dead wood host different fungal communities to natural woody substrates
- Perry and Thill 2013 Comparison of snag densities among regen treatments mixed pine hardwoods
- Raphael and White 1984 Use of snags by cavity nesting birds in Sierra Nevada
- Ripper et al 2005 Landscape use by hairy woodpeckers NW WA
- Ross and Niwa 1997 Using pheromones of DF beetle to produce snags
- Ross et al 2006 DF beetle response to artificial creation of down wood in the OR Coast Range
- Russel et al 2006 Snag longevity in relation to wildfire and postfire salvage logging
- Saab et al 2002 Selection of fire created snags at 2 spatial scales by cavity nesting birds
- Saab et al 2004 Factors influencing occupancy of nest cavities in recently burned forests
- Schreiber and DeCalesta 1992 Relationship between cavity nesting birds and snags on clearcuts in W OR
- Scott et al 1977 Cavity excavating birds of NA Forests
- Shea et al 2002 Girdled vs bark beetle created pp snags utilization decay insect diversity
- Spierling and Knight 2005 Snag density and use Black Hills
- Steffen and Moghaddas 2005 Fuel treatment effects on snags and course woody debris in Sierra Nevada mixed conifer
- Stevenson et al 2006 Abundance and attributes of wildlife trees 3 silv treatments bc
- Stribling et al 1990 Bird community response to tsi and snag retention
- Vierling and Lentile 2006 Red headed woodpecker nest site selection in repro in mixed pp and aspen following fire
- Walter and Maguire 2005 Snags_cavity nesting birds and silv treatments
- Watson and Shaw 2018 Veiled Polypore and WHWO
- Weiss et al 2018 Wildlife implications across snag treatment types in jack pine stands of upper MI
- Wilhere 2003 Simulation of snag dynamics in industrial DF forest
- Wilk et al 2018 Nest trees of northern spotted owls
- Wilson and Carey 2000 Legacy retention vs thinning_influences on small mammals
- Witt 2010 Characteristics of aspen infected with heartrot Implications for cavity nesting birds
- Wooley et al 2007 Created wildlife tree monitoring report Willamette NF
- Wooley et al 2007 Created wildlife tree monitoring Willamette NF unpub
- Zahner 2012 Heart rot as a key factor for cavity tree selection in the BBW
- Zarnock et al 2013 Snag characteristics dynamics following natural and artificially induced ort in mngd loblolly pine forest
- Zarnowitz and Manuwal 1985 Forest management cavity nesting birds NW WA
- Acker, S.A., Sabin, T.E., Ganio, L.M., and McKee, W.A. 1998a. Development of old-growth structure and timber volume growth trends in maturing Douglas-fir stands. Forest Ecology and Management 104:265-280.
- Acker, S.A., Zenner, E.K. and Emmingham, W.H. 1998b. Structure and yield of two-aged stands on the Willamette National Forest, Oregon: implications for green tree retention. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28:749-758.
- Andrews, L.S., Perkins, J.P., Thrailkill, J.A., Poage, N.J., and Tappeiner, J.C. 2005. Silvicultural approaches to develop northern spotted owl nesting sites, central Coast Ranges, Oregon. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 20(1):12-27.
- Aubry, K.B., Halpern, C.B., and Peterson, C.E. 2009. Variable-retention harvests in the Pacific Northwest: A review of short-term findings from the DEMO study. Forest Ecology and Management 258:398-408.
- Bailey, J.D., and Tappeiner, J.C. 1998. Effects of thinning on structural development in 40- to 100-year-old Douglas-fir stands in western Oregon. Forest Ecology and Management 108:99-113.
- Bauhus, J., Puettmann, K., and Messier, C. 2009. Silviculture for old-growth attributes. Forest Ecology and Management 258:525-537.
- Burton, J.I., Ganio, L.M., and Puettmann, K.J. 2014. Multi-scale spatial controls of understory vegetation in Douglas-fir-western hemlock forests of western Oregon, USA. Ecosphere 5(12):1-34.
- Busing, R.T., and Garman, S.L. 2002. Promoting old-growth characteristics and long-term wood production in Douglas-fir forests. Forest Ecology and Management 160:161-175.
- Carey, A.B. 2003. Restoration of landscape function: reserves or active management? Forestry 76(2):221-230.
- Carey, A.B., Lippke, B.R., and Sessions, J. 1999. Intentional systems management: managing forests for biodiversity. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 9(3/4):83-119.
- Chambers, C.L., McComb, W.C., Tappeiner, J.C., Kellogg, L.D., Johnson, R.L., and Spycher, G. 1999. CFIRP: what we learned in the first ten years. The Forestry Chronicle 75(3):431-434.
- Cole, E., and Newton, M. 2009. Tenth-year survival and size of underplanted seedlings in the Oregon Coast Range. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:580-595.
- Comfort, E.J., Roberts, S.D., and Harrington, C.A. 2010. Midcanopy growth response following thinning in young-growth conifer forests on the Olympic Peninsula western Washington. Forest Ecology and management 259:1606-1614.
- Curtis, R.O. 1994. Some simulation estimates of mean annual increment of Douglas-fir: results limitations, and implications for management. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Research Paper. PNW-RP-471.
- Curtis, R.O. 1995. Extended rotations and culmination age of coast Douglas-fir: old studies speak to current issues. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Research Paper. PNW-RP-485.
- Curtis, R.O. 1998. "Selective cutting" in Douglas-fir. Journal of Forestry 96(7):40-46.
- Curtis, R.O., DeBell, D.S., Harrington, C.A., Lavender, D.P., St. Clair, J.B., Tappeiner, J.C., and Walstad, J.D. 1998. Silviculture for multiple objectives in the Douglas-fir region. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report. PNW-GTR-435.
- Deal, R.L., and Tappeiner, J.C. 2002. The effects of partial cutting on stand structure and growth of western hemlock-Sitka spruce stands in southeast Alaska. Forest Ecology and Management 159:173-186.
- Deal, R.L., Tappeiner, J.C., and Hennon, P.E. 2002. Developing silvicultural systems based on partial cutting in western hemlock-Sitka spruce stands of southeast Alaska. Forestry 75(4):425-431.
- Devine, W.D., and Harrington, T.B. 2008. Belowground competition influences growth of natural regeneration in thinned Douglas-fir stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38:3085-3097.
- Dodson, E.K., Ares, A., and Puettmann, K.J. 2012. Early Responses to thinning treatments designed to accelerate late successional forest structure in young coniferous stands of western Oregon, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 42:345-355.
- Dodson, E.K., Burton, J.I., and Puettmann, K.J. 2014. Multiscale controls on natural regeneration dynamics after partial overstory removal in Douglas-fir forests in western Oregon, USA. Forest Science 60(5):953-961.
- Franklin, J.F. 1993. Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes? Ecological Applications 3(2):202-205.
- Franklin, J.F., Spies, T.A., Van Pelt, R., Carey, A.B., Thornburgh, D.A., Berg, D.R., Lindenmayer, D.B., Harmon, M.E., Keeton, W.S., Shaw, D.C., Bible, K., and Chen, J. 2002. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. Forest Ecology and Management 155:399-423.
- Freund, J.A., Franklin, J.F., and Lutz, J.A. 2015. Structure of early old-growth Douglas-fir forests in the Pacific Northwest. Forest Ecology and Management 335:11-25.
- Fruend, J.A., Franklin, J.F., Larson, A.J., and Lutz, J.A. 2014. Multi-decadal establishment for single-cohort Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44:1068-1078.
- Gap Size, Within-Gap Position and Canopy Structure Effects on Conifer Seedling Establishment
- Garber, S., Lam, T.Y., and Maguire, D.A. 2011. Growth and mortality of residual Douglas-fir after regeneration harvests under group selection and two-story silvicultural systems. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 26(2):64-70.
- Gray, A.N., and Spies, T.A. 1996. Gap size, within-gap position and canopy structure effects on conifer seedling establishment. Journal of Ecology 84:635-645.
- Gray, A.N., and Spies, T.A. 1997. Microsite controls on tree seedling establishment in conifer forest canopy gaps. Ecology 78(8):2458-2473.
- Gray, A.N., Spies, T.A., and Pabst, R.J. 2012. Canopy gaps affect long-term patterns of tree growth and mortality in mature and old-growth forests in the Pacific Northwest. Forest Ecology and Management 281:111-120.
- Halpern, C.B., and Spies, T.A. 1995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 5(4):913-934.
- Halpern, C.B., Halaj, J., Evans, S.A., and Dovciak, M. 2012. Level and pattern of overstory retention interact to shape long-term responses of understories to timber harvest. Ecological Applications 22(8):2049-2064.
- Halpern, C.B., McKenzie, D., Evans, S.A., and Maguire, D.A. 2005. Initial responses of forest understories to varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention. Ecological Applications 15(1):175-195.
- Hansen, A.J., Garman, S.L., Weigand, J.F., Urban, D.L., McComb, W.C., and Raphael, M.G. 1995. Alternative silvicultural regimes in the Pacific Northwest: Simulations of ecological and economic effects. Ecological Applications 5(3):535-554.
- Hansen, A.J., Spies, T.A., Swanson, F.J., and Ohmann, J.L. 1991. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests. Bioscience 41(6):382-392.
- Harrington, T.B. 2006. Five-year growth responses of Douglas-fir, western hemlock, and western redcedar seedlings to manipulated levels of overstory and understory competition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 36:2439-2453.
- Isaac, L.A. 1956. Place of partial cutting in old-growth stands of the Douglas-fir region. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Paper No. 16.
- Keeton, W.S., and Franklin, J.F. 2005. Do remnant old-growth trees accelerate rates of succession in mature Douglas-fir forests? Ecological Monographs 75(1):103-118.
- Kirkland, B.P., and Brandstrom, A.J.F. 1936. Selective timber management in the Douglas fir region. USDA Forest Service. Washington, DC.
- Kuehne, C., Weiskittle, A.R., Fraver, S., and Puettmann, K.J. 2015. Effects of thinning-induced changes in structural heterogeneity on growth, ingrowth, and mortality in secondary coastal Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 45:1448-1461.
- Lam, T.Y., and Maguire, D.A. 2011. Thirteen-year height and diameter growth of Douglas-fir seedlings under alternative regeneration cuts in the Pacific Northwest. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 26(2):57-63.
- Latham, P., and Tappeiner, J. 2002. Response of old-growth conifers to reduction in stand density in western Oregon forests. Tree Physiology 22:137-146.
- Latta, G., and Montgomery, C.A. 2004. Minimizing the cost of stand level management for older forest structure in western Oregon. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 19(4):221-231.
- Lindenmayer, D.B., Franklin, J.F.,and Fischer, J. 2006. General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 131:433-445.
- Long, J.N. 1998. Multiaged systems in the central and southern Rockies. Journal of Forestry 96(7):34-36.
- Maguire, D.A., Halpern, C.B., and Phillips, D.L. 2007. Changes in forest structure following variable-retention harvests in Douglas-fir dominated forests. Forest Ecology and Management 242:708-726.
- McComb, W.C., Spies, T.A., and Emmingham, W.H. 1993. Douglas-fir forests: managing for timber and mature-forest habitat. Journal of Forestry 91(12):31-42.
- Miller, M., and Emmingham, B. 2001. Can selection thinning convert even-age Douglas-fir stands to uneven-age structures? Western Journal of Applied Forestry 16(1):35-43.
- Munger, T.T. 1950. A look at selective cutting in Douglas-fir. Journal of Forestry 48(2):97-99.
- Newton, M., and Cole, E.C. 1987. A sustained-yield scheme for old-growth Douglas-fir. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 2(1):22-25.
- Newton, M., and Cole, L. 2015. Overstory development in Douglas-fir-dominant forests thinned to enhance late-seral features. Forest Science 61(4):809-816.
- Nonaka, E., Spies, T.A., Wimberly, M.C., and Ohmann, J.L. 2007. Historical range of variability in live and dead wood biomass: a regional-scale simulation study. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37:2349-2364.
- O'Hara, K.L. 1998. Silviculture for structural diversity: a new look at multiaged systems. Journal of Forestry 96(7):4-10.
- O'Hara, K.L., and Gersonde, R.L. 2004. Stocking control concepts in uneven-aged silviculture. Forestry 77(2):131-143.
- Poage, N.J. and Tappeiner, J.C. 2002. Long-term patterns of diameter and basal area growth of old-growth Douglas-fir trees in western Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32:1232-1243.
- Poage, N.J., Weisberg, P.J., Impara, P.C., Tappeiner, J.C., and Sensenig, T.S. 2009. Influences of climate, fire, and topography on contemporary age structure patterns of Douglas-fir at 205 old forest sites in western Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:1518-1530.
- Puettmann, K.J., and Tappeiner, J.C. 2014. Multi-scale assessments highlight silvicultural opportunities to increase species diversity and spatial variability in forests. Forestry 87:1-10.
- Roberts, S.D., and Harrington, C.A. 2008. Individual tree growth response to variable-density thinning in coastal Pacific Northwest forests. Forest Ecology and Management 255:2771-2781.
- Shatford, J.P.A., Bailey, J.D., and Tappeiner, J.C. 2009. Understory tree development with repeated stand density treatments in coastal Douglas-fir forests of Oregon. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 24(1):11-16.
- Schulte, L.A., Mitchell, R.J., Hunter, M.L., Franklin, J.F., McIntyre, R.K., and Palik, B.J. 2006. Evaluating the conceptual tools for forest biodiversity conservation and their implementation in the U.S. Forest Ecology and Management 232:1-11.
- Selective Timber Management In The Douglas-Fir Region
- Spies, T.A., and Franklin, J.F. 1988. Old growth and forest dynamics in the Douglas-fir region of western Oregon and Washington. Natural Areas Journal 8(3):190-201.
- Spies, T.A., and Franklin, J.F. 1991. The structure of natural young, mature, and old-growth Douglas-fir forests in Oregon and Washington. P91-109 in Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir forests. Ruggiero, L.F., Aubrey, K.B., Carey, A.B., and Huff, M.H. (tech. cords.). USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. PNW-GTR-285.
- Spies, T.A., Franklin, J.F., and Thomas, T.B. 1988. Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology 69(6):1689-1702.
- Spies, T.A., Hemstrom, M.A., Youngblood, A., and Hummel, S. 2006. Conserving old-growth forest diversity in disturbance-prone landscapes. Conservation Biology 20(2):351-362.
- Swanson, F.J., and Franklin, J.F. 1992. New forestry principles from ecosystem analysis of Pacific Northwest Forests. Ecological Applications 2(3):262-274.
- Tappeiner, J.C., Huffman, D., Marshall, D., Spies, T.A., and Bailey, J.D. 1997. Density, ages, and growth rates in old-growth and young-growth forests in coastal Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest 27:638-348.
- Tepley, A.J., Swanson, F.J, and Spies, T.A. 2014. Post-fire tree establishment and early cohort development in conifer forests of the western Cascades of Oregon, USA. Ecosphere 5(7):1-23.
- Tepley, A.J., Swanson, F.J., and Spies, T.A. 2013. Fire-mediated pathways of stand development in Douglas-fir/western hemlock forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Ecology 94(8):1729-1743.
- Weisburg, P.J. 2004. Importance of non-stand-replacing fire for development of forest structure in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Forest Science 50(2):245-258.
- Wilson, D.S., and Puettmann, K.J. 2007. Density management and biodiversity in young Douglas-fir forests: challenges of managing across scales. Forest Ecology and Management 246:123-134.
- Winter, L.E., Brubaker, L.B., Franklin, J.F., Miller, E.A., and DeWitt, D.Q. 2002a. Initiation of an old-growth Douglas-fir stand in the Pacific Northwest: a reconstruction from tree-ring records. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32:1039-1056.
- Winter, L.E., Brubaker, L.B., Franklin, J.F., Miller, E.A., and DeWitt, D.Q. 2002b. Canopy disturbances over the five-century lifetime of an old-growth Douglas-fir stand in the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32:1057-1070.
- Zenner, E.K. 2000. Do residual trees increase structural complexity in Pacific Northwest coniferous forests? Ecological Applications 10(3):800-810.
- Zenner, E.K., Acker, S.A., and Emmingham, W.H. 1998. Growth reduction in harvest-age, coniferous forests with residual trees in the western central Cascade Range of Oregon. Forest Ecology and Management 102:75-88.
- Adams et al. 2011. Rejuvenation of big huckleberry fields to promote fruit production Poster
- Agee 1996
- Agee and Kertis 1987
- Agee and Smith 1983
- Alexander et al. 2001. Issues about mgmt of NTFP
- Almack 1986
- Anzinger. 2002. Big huckleberry mt hood and warm springs
- Arno 1980
- Arno 2000
- Author unknown. 2012. Growing Huckleberries notes
- Barclay-Estrup 1987
- Barmore et al. 1976
- Barney et al. 2006. Soil Characteristics Associated with Wild Huckleberry and Bilberry Colonies
- Barney. 1999. Growing Huckleberries
- Barrett 1999
- Beetle 1962
- Boyd 1999
- Boyer. 2006. Huckleberry restoration on the Gifford Pinchot From Huckleberry Workshop ppt
- Burke 1979
- Butler 1979
- Charnley and Donoghue. 2007. SS Team First Food ideas
- Charnley et al. 2007. Integrating TEK into biodiversity conservation
- Charnley et al. 2008. GTR 751_Integrating TEK into biodiversity conservation
- Clary 1983
- Cole and Trull 1992
- Crawford et al. 1986
- Dahlengreen 1984 abstract
- Dahlgreen 1984
- Darrow 1960
- Davis and Butterfield 1991
- del Moral and Long 1977
- del Moral and Watson 1978
- Donnelly 1993
- Douglas 1970 abstract
- Douglas 1972
- Doyle et al. 1998
- Drew 1967
- Edge et al. 1988
- Fettig et al. 2013. Changing Climate changing forests
- Fonda and Bliss 1969
- Franklin 1966
- French 1999
- Gabriel 1976
- Gerwing. 2011. Assessing effectiveness of stand mgmt for huckleberry enhancement
- Gobin et al. 2011. Huckleberry Pile Burning Mt Hood NF
- Goldin and Nimlos 1977
- Gorzelak et al. 2012. Community structure of ricoid mycorrhizas and root fungi VAME
- Goschke. 2009. Treaty protected resources on ceded public-mpp
- Gough 1998
- Habeck 1967
- Habeck 1968
- Habeck 1976
- Halverson and Emmingham 1982
- Hamersley Chambers. 2016. PhD Proposal. The Lost Gardens British Columbia
- Hamilton 1988
- Hamilton and Peterson. 2003. Response of veg to burning in subalpine central BC
- Hamilton and Yearsley 1988
- Harrington et al. 1999
- Hemstrom and Franklin. 1982. Fire and other disturbances Mt. Rainier
- Holmson, B. 2006. Mowich Huckleberry Project Gifford Pinchot NF Huckleberry Workshop presentation
- Hudec. 2012. Huckleberry fuels and fire ecology report Polepatch draft
- Hungerford 1957
- Hunn 1981
- Hunn and Norton 1984
- Ingersoll and Wilson 1990
- Jaqua. 2002. Sherar burn and huckleberries
- Jimenez. 2006. Introduction to selected huckleberry restoration projects Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs presentation at Huckleberry Workshop
- Johnson 1999
- Jones et al. 2008. DNR Umatilla River Vision
- Jones. 2000. Non Timber Forest Products Considerations for Tribal Forestry
- Kendall 1986
- Kerns et al. 2004. Huckleberry abundance stand conditions use in W OR role of forest mgmt
- Kessell and Potter 1980
- Kingery et al. 1996
- Klebenow 1965
- Kramer and Johnson 1987
- Largent et al. 1980
- LeCompte 2015. Restoring coast Salish foods. PhD Dissertation
- LeCompte Mastenbrook. 2011. Native Americans traditional foods and the management of public lands
- Lepofsky et al. 1985
- Lindh. 2008. Flowering of understory herbs after thinning
- Lyon and Stickney 1966
- Mace and Bissell 1986
- Mack. 2003. American Indian Fire on Mt Ranier
- Miller 1976
- Minore and Dubrasich. 1978. Big huckleberry Mt Adams GTR 322
- Minore et al. 1979. Part 1 ecology and mgmt of huckleberry in PNW
- Minore et al. 1979. Part 2 ecology and mgmt of huckleberry in PNW
- Minore. 1984. Vaccinium Membranaceum Berry production Seven years After Treatment to Reduce Overstory Tree Canopies
- Neil. 2011. Adaptive capacity thinning to improve food availability under climate change
- Neiland 1958
- Noble 1985
- Norton et al. 1999
- Orme and Leege 1976
- OSU Extension. 2016. Northwest Berry & Grape Information Network Blueberry Pollination
- Oswald and Brown 1993
- Patten and Knight 1994
- Pierce 1984
- Potash-Martin et al. 2008. MTB Snoqu huckleberry monitoring and enhancement plan
- Reichert 1989
- Rice. 2012. Huckleberries on the Mt Hood NF
- Rice. 2012. Salmonberry Timber sale review
- Rice. 2004. Huckleberry Enhancement Opportunities
- Richards and Alexander. 2006. GTR657 Social History of Huckleberry Harvesting
- Ripple 1994
- Ruchty. 2008. Huckleberry Position Statement GP
- Ruediger 1978
- Schoomaker and McKee 1988
- Schwartz and Mitchell 1945
- Scrivner and Smith 1984
- Spivak et al. 2011. Plight of the bees
- Starbuck et al. 2004. Valuing SFP for harvesting two sep travel cost rec demand analysis
- Stark 1977
- Steele 1977
- Steele 1984
- Steele and Geier-Hayes 1991
- Steele and Stark 1977
- Stephenson. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion causes and functions
- Stewart 1988
- Stickney 1989
- Thomas and Schuman. 1993. NTFP Income Opportunities self help guide
- Thompson. 2006. TEK and tribal federal collaboration 3 case studies in W US
- Turner et al. 2008. From invisibility to transparency TEK
- Unsworth et al. 1989
- USDA NRCS. 19xx. Plant Guide VAME
- USDA USFS 2010. Huckleberry Enhancement EA
- USDA USFS. 1996. Early Seral Plant Communities MTH NF
- USDA USFS. 2002. Review of huckleberry ecology for salmonberry timber sale
- USDA USFS. 2005. DM Summitt Thin
- USDA USFS. 2009. Author unknown. Sawtooth fire and fuels report
- USDA USFS. 2009. Sawtooth Huckleberry Restoration EA
- USDA USFS. 2000. Mt Hood National Forest Huckleberry Mgmt Plan
- Vogl and Ryder 1969
- Wang and Jakes. 1996. Legislating the past Cultural resources USFS
- Wang. 2002. Heritage mgmt Mt Hood NF case study
- Waring 1969
- Weisberg. 1998. Fire history fire regimes forest structure in central western OR cascades
- Welch et al. 1997
- Wilkinson et al. 2007. Other voices, Other ways
- Yang et al. 2011. Effect of consumers and mutualists of VAME at Mt St Helens
- Yang et al. 2008. Colonization genetics of an animal dispersed plant VAME at Mt. St. Helens
- Young and Robinette 1939
Literature
April 15, 2020
- Bibliography with links
- Compiled by Cheryl Ann Friesen, Science Liaison, USFS
Videos
- Tethered Feller
- Tethered Shovel
- Tethered Commercial Thinning <missing>
- Adverse Forwarding, clearcut
Papers
- Acuna, Mauricio; J. Skinnel, T. Evanson, and R. Mitchell. 2011. Bunching with a Self-leveling Feller-Buncher on Steep Terrain for Efficient Yarder Extraction. In: Croatian Journal for Engineering 32(2011)2.
- Amishev, D. 2011. Steep slope feller buncher: a feasibility study. Future Forests Research. Report #FFR-H007.
- Belart, F., B. Leshchinsky, J. Sessions, W. Chung, P. Green, J. Wimer, and B. Morrissette. 2018. Sliding Stability of Cable-Assisted Tracked Equipment on Steep Slopes. For. Sci. 65(3):304-311.
- Belart, F., B. Leshchinsky, J. Sessions, W. Chung, G. Preston, J. Wimer, B. Morrissette, and J. Garland. 2018. Tether assist equipment stability and soil-machine interaction in step slope logging. Presented at the 41st Annual Council on Forest Engineering Meeting, Williamsburg, Virginia, July 15-18, 2018. Revolutionary Traditions, Innovative Industries.
- Berkett, Hamish. 2012. An Examination of the current slope gradients being experienced by ground-based forest machines in New Zealand plantation forests. Master's Thesis, School of Forestry, Future Forests Research, University of Canterbury.
- Berkett, H. and R. Visser. 2012. Measuring Slope of Forestry Machines on Steep Terrain. Future Forests Research. Report #HTN05-02.
- Bombosch, F., D. Sohns, R. Nollau, and H. Kanzler. 2003. Are forest operations on steep terrain (average of 70% slope inclination) with wheel mounted forwarders without slippage possible? Austro 2003: High Tech Forest Operations for Mountainous Terrain, October 5-9, 2003, Schlaegl - Austria.
- Cavalli, R. and D. Amishev. 2019. Steep terrain forest operations - challenges, technology development, current implementation, and future opportunities. International Journal of Forest Engineering 30(3):175-181.
- Chase, C. W., M. Reiterb, J. A. Homyacka, J. E. Jonesc, E. B. Sucreb. 2019. Soil disturbance and stream-adjacent disturbance from tethered logging in Oregon and Washington. Forest Ecology and Management 454(2019).
- Chung, W., B. Morrissette, P. Green, B. Leshchinsky, F. Belart, J. Sessions, J. Wimer and J. Garland. 2019. Effects of pre-bunching logs with a tethered feller-buncher on the productivity and costs of cable logging. In Preparation.
- Chung, W. B. Morrissette, B. Leshchinsky, K. Bladon, J. Hatten, F. Belart, J. Sessions, J. Wimer and J. Garland. 2019. Impacts of tethered logging on soil disturbance: a case study in southwest Oregon. In Preparation.
- Garland, J., F. Belart, R. Crawford, W. Chung, T. Cushing, S. Fitzgerald, P. Green, L. Kincl, B. Leshchinsky, B. Morrissette, J. Sessions and J. Wimer. 2019. Safety aspects of operators in steep slope logging. Journal of Agromedicine 24(2):138-145.
- Ghaffariyan, M. R. 2014. A Short Review of Efficient Ground-Based Harvesting Systems for Steep and Mountainous Areas. In: Bulletin of the Transylvania University of Brasov. Series II: Vol. 7 (56) No. 2-2014.
- Ghaffariyan, M. R., M. Acuna, and P. Ackerman. 2013. CRC for Forestry 1 Review of new ground-based logging technologies for steep terrain review of new ground-based logging.
- Girvan, J. 2016. Steep slope logging - balancing cost safety and productivity. Truck logger BC. 2016, pgs. 54-59.
- Green, P., W. Chung, B. A. Morrissette, F. Belart, K. Bladon, J. A. Hatten, and J. Sessions. 2018. Environmental and economic comparison of cable-assisted harvesting systems in the Pacific Northwest. Presented at the 41st Annual Council on Forest Engineering Meeting, Williamsburg, Virginia, July 15-18, 2018. Revolutionary Traditions, Innovative Industries.
- Green, P., W. Chung, B. Leshchinsky, F. Belart, J. Sessions, S. Fitzgerald, J. Wimer, T. Cushing, and J. Garland. 2020. Insight into the Productivity, Cost and Soil Impacts of Cable-assisted Harvester-forwarder Thinning in Western Oregon.For. Sci. 66(1):82-96.
- Hancock Forest Management®. 2016. Interim Best Practice Guideline, Cable Assisted Steep Slope Harvesting. Hancock Forest Management®, New Zealand.
- Leshchinsky, B., F. Belart, K. Lyons, and J. Sessions. A mobility model for tethered wheeled skidders and forwarders. In Preparation.
- Lyons, K., J. Sessions and J. Wimer. 2020. Design of continuous bridle multiple-stump anchors. International Journal of Forest Engineering. Volume 31(1).
- Lyons, K., J. Sessions and J. Wimer. 2020. The effect on tether tension when using trees to redirect live machine tethers. In Review, Biosystems Engineering.
- McEwan, A., M. Brink, and S. van Zyl. 2013. Guidelines for difficult terrain ground based harvesting operations in South Africa. Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, Forest Engineering Southern Africa, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University. ICFR Bulletin 02-2013.
- Naillon, T. 2017. Timber Faller Perspectives on Tethered Logging Operations. Washington State Department of Labor & Industries. Technical Report Number 11-3-2017.
- Naillon, T. and C. Rappin. 2019. Best Management and Operating Practices for Steep Slope Machine Logging. Technical Report # 98-02-2019. Research Investigator Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program Washington State Department of Labor & Industries.
- OSHA. 2016. Oregon OSHA's revised guidelines for using tethered logging systems.
- Petitmermet, J., J. Sessions, J. Bailey, and R. Zamora-Cristales. 2019. Cost and Productivity of Tethered Cut-to-Length Systems in a Dry-Forest Fuel-Reduction Treatment: A Case Study. For. Sci. 65(5):581-592.
- Pierzchala, M., B. Talbot, and R. Astrup. 2014. Estimating Soil Displacement from Timber Extraction Trails in Steep Terrain: Application of an Unmanned Aircraft for 3D Modeling. In: Forests 2014(5), 1212-1223.
- Raymond, K. Innovation to increase profitability of steep terrain harvesting in New Zealand. Future Forests Research Ltd.
- Sessions, J., B. Leshchinsky, W. Chung, K. Boston, and J. Wimer. 2017. Theoretical Stability and Traction of Steep Slope Tethered Feller-Bunchers. Forest Science 63(2):192-200.
- Stuart, W. B. and J. L. Carr. 1991. Harvesting Impacts on Steep Slopes in Virginia. In: Proceedings, 8th Central Hardwood Forest Conference.
- Visser, R. and K. Stampfer. 2015. Expanding Ground-based Harvesting onto Steep Terrain: A Review. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 36(2015)2.
- Visser, R., K. Raymond, and H. Harill. 2013. Developing Fully Mechanized Steep Terrain Harvesting Operations. School of Forestry, University of Christchurch, New Zealand.
- Zamora-Cristales, R., P. Adams, and J. Sessions. 2014. Ground-Based Thinning on Steep Slopes in Western Oregon: Soil Exposure and Strength Effects. Forest Science 60(5):1014-1020.
PowerPoints
- Ball, Lisa. Tethered logging overview. <missing>
- Leshchinsky, B., F. Belart, W. Chung, T. Cushing, J. Garland, P. Green, B. Morrissette, and J. Sessions. Tethered equipment on steep slopes: Soil-machine interaction. OSU 2018.
- Miller. 2018. Field Trip handouts dry forest restoration on steep terrain: a harvesting demonstration of tethered assist ground bases systems on eastside steep slopes.
- Montico Forest LTD. 2016. Steep slope logging with harvester forwarder systems and combinations.
- Rone, Gina. Soil resource management for ground based logging on steep slopes. (Soil Scientist, Fremont Winema NF).
- Berkett, H. and R. Visser. 2011. Using Ground‐Based Harvesting Machinery on Steep Slopes. New Zealand School of Forestry.
- Peterman, Wendy. Steep slope tethered logging. Soil Scientists, Willamette NF. With Video.
Practitioner Reports
- Steep slope logging risk assessment form.
- Steep slope logging with ground based cut to length equipment with a tether system on the Colville National Forest. Sarah Brame and Jason Jimenez Soil Scientists Colville National Forest September 9th, 2019.
- Colville National Forest - 2019 - Land Management Plan Soil Resource Supplement Updating of Existing Soil Resource Reports from 1988 Colville National Forest - Land and Resource Management Forest Plan to 2019 Colville National Forest - Land Management Plan and Updated Standard Practices and Design Elements December 2019. Jason Jimenez, Soil Scientist, Colville National Forest.
- Excerpt from draft soils analysis for the Stella Vegetation Project, High Cascades Ranger District, Rogue River-Siskiyou NF. Joni Brazier, 3/27/2020. Ground-based Mechanized Tethered/Winch-Assisted Systems on Steep Slopes.
- Fre-Win soils monitoring. Gina Rone.
Websites
Info on steep slope, ground-based operations and equipment, safety, etc.):
Silvicultural Treatment Impacts on Fuels and Wildfire Behavior in Moist, Westside Pacific Northwest Forests
- Powers - Westside Silv & Fire Biblio Final
A Summary of Relevant Literature
- Agee & Skinner 2005 - FEM
- Agee 1996 - Conf Proceedings
- Agee et al. 2000 - FEM
- Agee et al. 2002 - FEM
- Andrews et al. 2005 - WJAF
- Ares et al. 2007 - GTR
- Azuma et al. 2004 - GTR
- Bailey & Tappeiner 1998 - FEM
- Bailey et al. 1998 - FEM
- Belart et al. 2017 - For Sci
- Bose et al. 2018 - For Ecol Manag
- Bradley et al. 2016 - Ecosphere
- Brown et al. 2004 - Conserv Biol
- Burton et al. 2014 - Ecosphere
- Chan et al. 2006 - CJFR
- Chase et al. 2016 - FEM
- Christiansen and Pickford 1991 - NW Science
- Cole and Newton 2009 - CJFR
- Cole et al. 2017 - FEM
- Comfort et al. 2010 - FEM
- Crotteau and Keyes 2020 - Forests
- Crotteau et al. 2018 - Fire Ecology
- Cruz & Alexander 2012 - Int J Wildland Fire
- Curtis 2006 - WJAF
- Dagley et al. 2018
- Davis et al. 2007 - NW Science
- de Montigny & Smith 2017 - Forestry
- Deal et al. 2002
- Devine & Harrington 2008 - CJFR
- Dodson et al. 2012 - CJFR
- Dodson et al. 2014 - For Sci
- Dunn & Bailey 2016 - FEM
- Dunn et al. 2020 - Ecosphere
- Edmonds 1979 - CJFR
- Edmonds et al. 1986
- Erickson et al. 1985 - CJFR
- Estes et al. 2012 - Int J Wildland Fire
- Faiella & Bailey 2007 - Int J Wildland Fire
- Fonda & Binney 2011 - NW Science
- Ganey et al. 2017 - Fire Ecology
- Ganio & Progar 2017 - FEM
- Godoy et al. 2013 - Int J Wildland Fire
- Gray and Spies 1996 - J Ecol
- Grayson et al. 2017 - FEM
- Halofsky et al. 2018 - Climatic Change
- Halofsky et al. 2018 - Plos One
- Halofsky et al. 2020 - Fire Ecology
- Halpern & Spies 1995 - Ecol Apps
- Halpern et al. 2005
- Halpern et al. 2012 - Ecol Apps
- Harrington 2006 - CJFR
- Harrington et al. 2018 - FEM
- Harrod et al. 2009 - FEM
- Hessburg et al. 2016 - FEM
- Hood & Lutes 2017 - Fire Ecol
- Huggett et al. 2008 - For Policy & Econ
- Jang et al. 2017 - For Sci
- Johnson et al. 2019 - CJFR
- Johnston et al. 2019 - FEM
- Kalies & Kent 2016 - FEM
- Kennedy & Johnson 2014 - FEM
- Knapp et al. 2005 - FEM
- Korb et al. 2020 - Forests
- Lam & Maguire 2011 - WJAF
- Larson & Franklin 2005 - FEM
- Latham & Tappeiner 2002 - Tree Physiology
- Law & Waring 2015 - FEM
- Levine et al. 2020 - Int J Wildland Fire
- Lilles et al. 2018 - FEM
- Littell et al. 2010 - Clim Change
- Littke et al. 2020 - FEM
- Lyons-Tinsley & Peterson 2012 - FEM
- Maguire & Chambers 2005
- McCaskill 2018 - Forests
- Means et al. 1996 - Coast Range GTR
- Meigs et al. 2020 - CJFR
- Miles et al. 2005 - GTR
- Miller and Emmingham 2001 - WJAF
- Mitchell et al. 2009 - Ecol Appl
- Morris 1958 - PNW Res Pap
- Nabel et al. 2013 - FEM
- Neill and Puettmann 2013 - CJFR
- Odion et al. 2004 - Conserv Biol
- Omi and Martinson 2002 - JFSP Report
- Ottmar and Sandberg 1986 - PNW GTR
- Peterson et al. 2019 - FEM
- Pollet & Omi 2002 - Int J Wildland Fire
- Pook and Gill 1993 - Int J Wildland Fire
- Prichard & Kennedy 2012 - Int J Wildland Fire
- Prichard & Kennedy 2014 - Ecol Appl
- Prichard et al. 2010 - CJFR
- Prichard et al. 2020 - Ecol Appl
- Rambo & North 2009 - FEM
- Raymond & Peterson 2005 - CJFR
- Roberts and Harrington 2008
- Roberts et al. 2005 - FEM
- Rogers et al. 2011 - J Geophys Res
- Ruth and Harris 1975 - PNW GTR
- Samran et al. 1995 - For Sci
- Schoennagel et al. 2017 - PNAS
- Shatford et al. 2009 - WJAF
- Shaw et al. 2016 - J For
- Shen et al. 2019 - For Sci
- Steel et al. 2015 - Ecosphere
- Steen 1965 - PNW Res Note
- Stephens & Moghadda 2005 - Biol Conserv
- Stephens 1998 - FEM
- Stephens et al. 2009 - Ecol Appl
- Sullivan et al. 2001 - J Appl Ecol
- Teensma 1996 - PNW GTR
- Thompson & Spies 2009 - FEM
- Thompson et al. 2011 - FEM
- Urgenson et al. 2013 - CJFR
- Van Wagner 1977 - CJFR
- van Wagtendonk 1996
- Weatherspoon 1996
- Whitehead et al. 2006 - RMRS Res Pap
- Williams and Powers 2019 - Ecosphere
- Willis et al. 2018 - FEM
- Wilson & Puettmann 2007 - FEM
- Wimberly & Liu 2014 - FEM
- Wimberly et al. 2009 - Ecol Appl
- Youngblood et al. 2008 - FEM
- Zald & Dunn 2018 - Ecol Appl
- Zenner et al. 1998 - FEM
CCAMP Contacts
For more information contact:
Cheryl Friesen
Science Liaison, Willamette National Forest
Phone: 541-521-1889
Email: cheryl.friesen@usda.gov